From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D89DC3B2A4
 for <ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 01:32:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501)
 id 81B35B4; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 07:32:03 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail;
 t=1563859923; bh=o+Y5x/GfptDYPsYZloONgfqYQ9ufV+WsSH0ZoQbgRno=;
 h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=rCK3lVUeIs39dz6qpTtHJrM3SG2VhO3fjCaIgY/AswxGncZe83dJOmePiDBnic/YW
 HfJLaPajdb3Rmd1QRKLJDALLgJQAPT8fSKN0cTVqVAlsCbtV7JKi/HcKV3RfSurlEW
 s5OaA/uFe0UjipA0nYRyWsdY9xlqWtsnQLNUtch8=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EADFB2;
 Tue, 23 Jul 2019 07:32:03 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 07:32:03 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Toke_H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>
cc: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>, 
 Jonathan Foulkes <jfoulkes@evenroute.com>, 
 "ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net" <ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net>, 
 Dave Taht <dave@taht.net>, "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <87sgqy3sqh.fsf@toke.dk>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1907230730580.19225@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1907221609330.19225@uplift.swm.pp.se>
 <CEECD0B0-7081-42DE-AA2C-5061749C9232@gmail.com> <87sgqy3sqh.fsf@toke.dk>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
 BOUNDARY="-137064504-1537115425-1563859923=:19225"
Subject: Re: [Ecn-sane] is FQ actually widely deployed?
X-BeenThere: ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of explicit congestion notification's impact on the
 Internet <ecn-sane.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/ecn-sane>,
 <mailto:ecn-sane-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/ecn-sane>
List-Post: <mailto:ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:ecn-sane-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/ecn-sane>,
 <mailto:ecn-sane-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 05:32:05 -0000

  This message is in MIME format.  The first part should be readable text,
  while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

---137064504-1537115425-1563859923=:19225
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT

On Mon, 22 Jul 2019, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:

> Anything derived from OpenWrt will also use FQ-CoDel on both WiFi and 
> wired links. Not sure how common those are, though...

I have OpenWrt derived devices that use hw acceleration and they are not 
using FQ_CODEL. So OpenWrt in itself doesn't mean FQ_CODEL is used.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se
---137064504-1537115425-1563859923=:19225--