From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3ABB53B2A4
 for <ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 01:34:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501)
 id 1E4A7B5; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 07:34:24 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail;
 t=1563860064; bh=LqfcVATFr0oT1AGZoEcV5wN2KDUpd8k/RAMqNUrnJyE=;
 h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=nifH19+/B5y3xkGrWFpBZHYKipx0p8UL2yWTVpAUQv1M5yThETzC6FzzI2ggXHFJx
 k2yMilZeBADjmM1gvWoOQOXxb0jFzbrh+Z8I+/IOSJIQGr3QIsD8JSuXNP4b/l+x9g
 qMbG55QaRvM1WxsgZt1oqZ27YCbfpWbMIq+6Hwpk=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C7C4B2;
 Tue, 23 Jul 2019 07:34:24 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 07:34:24 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
cc: Dave Taht <dave@taht.net>, 
 "ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net" <ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net>, 
 "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw4V_NtiuJJDtfVFBt-fHAWhkx7RFNFAaW=5gG3ORvV8cg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1907230732420.19225@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1907221609330.19225@uplift.swm.pp.se>
 <CAA93jw4V_NtiuJJDtfVFBt-fHAWhkx7RFNFAaW=5gG3ORvV8cg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [Ecn-sane] is FQ actually widely deployed?
X-BeenThere: ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of explicit congestion notification's impact on the
 Internet <ecn-sane.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/ecn-sane>,
 <mailto:ecn-sane-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/ecn-sane>
List-Post: <mailto:ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:ecn-sane-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/ecn-sane>,
 <mailto:ecn-sane-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 05:34:25 -0000

On Mon, 22 Jul 2019, Dave Taht wrote:

> Hmm? Nearly everything derived from openwrt commercially has it. More 
> generally, debian linux derived Google wifi, chromebooks, eero have 
> publically disclosed their usage.

For CPU based forwarding platforms, perhaps (and these are not the common 
ones). But one of the few OpenWrt hw acceleration platforms (MT7621) then 
FQ is not done on the hw accelerated flows afaik.

HW acceleration typically means FQ goes out the window.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se