From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD0DF3B29E for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2021 01:24:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id EC5D1AF; Sat, 20 Mar 2021 06:24:31 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1616217871; bh=Vutc7huGE7EaoRn1ZvIZsDUAbTAb2aJ4YtHJKSs5oPc=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=lvqrv4qdKximwqDyGYMWRASVJbjXyJUs1F4bwu3XWQ0mCaFUJtlQAtz9Vbj3vxIzd csYND6PoGHmGXqx49NgSsKEK2R3+qqH5+vY+9cTUBiYG/x/+Y4XuwKuMrLYhK4J0Qg k9w4iO9SKIMmUmEPxpOxuBwmm48ULyAvZ8ZNwEKg= Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id E837B9F; Sat, 20 Mar 2021 06:24:31 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 06:24:31 +0100 (CET) From: Mikael Abrahamsson To: Dave Taht cc: ECN-Sane In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) Organization: People's Front Against WWW MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Ecn-sane] mosh ecn bits washed out X-BeenThere: ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of explicit congestion notification's impact on the Internet List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 05:24:33 -0000 On Fri, 19 Mar 2021, Dave Taht wrote: > I had never noticed it "just worked" on ipv6 before now. Last I checked it however didn't switching between IPv4 and IPv6. So if I use IPv6 and I then end up on a network without IPv6, mosh doesn't work. It keeps trying only IPv6. It'd be nice if it bound to both AF and tried both all the time. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se