From: Jim Forster <jrforster@mac.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: Frantisek Borsik <frantisek.borsik@gmail.com>,
Dave Taht via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
Eugene Y Chang <eugene.chang@ieee.org>,
Colin_Higbie <CHigbie1@higbie.name>,
libreqos <libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [LibreQoS] [Starlink] It’s the Latency, FCC
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 23:27:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <177B7A46-A7F3-4F70-B975-30323E015F7A@mac.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw7iA27rm1WEvohZLVFzTqTaDt91Wf7_3D03OsOnb4dTiA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 884 bytes --]
I kind of like Waveform BB test, but a couple issues:
* From some places in India? and Southern Africa, the closest server they use is far away. Consequently the base latency is much higher than most content, which these days comes from CDNs.
* I don’t mind the ads, but I did get a comment from someone I referred to it, that the site was ‘mostly about trying to sell some gear’. WF could alleviate that with an explanation of who they are, etc. Maybe it’s there & I missed it?
— Jim
> On Apr 30, 2024, at 6:02 PM, Dave Taht via LibreQoS <libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>
> he also had a waveform result as best as I recall. Simpler than running flent.
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 2:23 PM Frantisek Borsik <frantisek.borsik@gmail.com <mailto:frantisek.borsik@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Here are the tests Dave was talking about:
>>
>>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2709 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-01 3:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.2779.1714503924.1074.starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
[not found] ` <MN2PR16MB339176B8EE09E7A4D7F1EECCF11A2@MN2PR16MB3391.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>
[not found] ` <1A972680-ECA5-42CA-BE8B-6BBD46FF5E74@ieee.org>
2024-04-30 21:07 ` Dave Taht
2024-04-30 21:22 ` Frantisek Borsik
2024-04-30 22:02 ` Dave Taht
2024-04-30 22:03 ` Dave Taht
2024-05-01 3:27 ` Jim Forster [this message]
2024-05-01 7:23 ` Frantisek Borsik
2024-04-30 21:22 ` Eugene Y Chang
2024-04-30 21:35 ` Frantisek Borsik
2024-04-30 21:53 ` Eugene Y Chang
2024-05-01 0:54 ` David Lang
2024-05-01 7:27 ` Frantisek Borsik
2024-05-01 7:32 ` Brian Munyao Longwe
2024-05-01 13:25 ` Jim Forster
2024-05-01 13:48 ` Brian Munyao Longwe
2024-05-01 13:57 ` Dave Taht
2024-05-01 8:48 ` [LibreQoS] [Starlink] musings on disruption and competition [was] " Sebastian Moeller
2024-05-01 21:24 ` Eugene Y Chang
2024-05-01 19:26 ` [LibreQoS] [Starlink] " Eugene Y Chang
2024-05-14 16:05 ` Dave Taht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/libreqos.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=177B7A46-A7F3-4F70-B975-30323E015F7A@mac.com \
--to=jrforster@mac.com \
--cc=CHigbie1@higbie.name \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=eugene.chang@ieee.org \
--cc=frantisek.borsik@gmail.com \
--cc=libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox