From: Mark Steckel <mjs@phillywisper.net>
To: "Dave Taht" <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: libreqos <libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
"\"robert chacón\"" <robert.chacon@jackrabbitwireless.com>
Subject: Re: [LibreQoS] ookla speedtest results?
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 16:49:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1840bc23065.e9b642741754104.1271754207271667701@phillywisper.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw4q2_fyc78VCLL3yk1_AV3b8hvRrpR2pysaiXs2TbpLCw@mail.gmail.com>
I'm happy to send one of the TP-Link in-wall units to Robert if he wants to play with it.
Note - we are looking to deploy these in a 200 unit apartment building using rgnets.com to manage the networking, user accounts and billing via PPSK. (rgnets is pretty slick stuff!)
I would be even happier if OpenWRT supported PPSK but I'm fairly certain it doesn't (certainly not to the point to be useful for rgnets.com which is by need/use case).
---- On Mon, 24 Oct 2022 16:31:32 -0400 Dave Taht via LibreQoS wrote ---
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 1:17 PM Robert Chacón
> robert.chacon@jackrabbitwireless.com> wrote:
> >
> > Here's a customer on a 200/30 Mbps plan via Fixed Wireless.
> > LibreQoS using cake diffserv4.
> > LTU-LR is the client radio. Home WiFi is 802.11AC which is where most of the bloat comes from.
>
> Yep! I'd like to collect a list of APs that are decent here, out of
> the box. 40ms does not seem "bad".
>
> It would be pretty cool to be able to A/B test one of these:
> https://openwrt.org/toh/tp-link/eap615-wall
>
> with stock vs openwrt vs my current openwrt branch, on a test like
> this. I don't know enough about the
> structure of speedtest and wifi is naturally jittery, but I was down
> to 8ms induced latency on a variety of tests
> on the mt76 chipset(s) before I put it down. (more important for wifi,
> is multi-station loading)
>
> Anyone fiddling with openwisp.org?
>
> > When he tests by Ethernet bloat is 8ms instead of 40ms.
>
> thanks very much! That's gorgeous!
>
> https://www.speedtest.net/result/13846818812
>
> I keep hoping speedtest are internally dissecting data from certain AS
> numbers and going "woah!" WTF are they doing?
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 12:28 PM Dave Taht via LibreQoS libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> Although I'm enjoying a good wide-ranging debate... is it possible one
> >> or more of you could
> >> take a speedtest.net test, click on results so you see the
> >> "responsiveness" data, and post a screen shot?
> >>
> >> Perlease??
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> LibreQoS mailing list
> >> LibreQoS@lists.bufferbloat.net
> >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/libreqos
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Robert Chacón
> > CEO | JackRabbit Wireless LLC
>
>
>
> --
> This song goes out to all the folk that thought Stadia would work:
> https://www.linkedin.com/posts/dtaht_the-mushroom-song-activity-6981366665607352320-FXtz
> Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
> _______________________________________________
> LibreQoS mailing list
> LibreQoS@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/libreqos
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-24 20:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-24 13:51 Dave Taht
2022-10-24 14:01 ` Herbert Wolverson
2022-10-24 15:02 ` Robert Chacón
2022-10-24 15:09 ` Dave Taht
2022-10-24 15:20 ` dan
2022-10-24 15:27 ` Dave Taht
2022-10-24 15:31 ` dan
2022-10-24 16:30 ` Herbert Wolverson
2022-10-24 16:48 ` dan
2022-10-24 17:14 ` Dave Taht
2022-10-24 17:30 ` dan
2022-10-24 17:39 ` Dave Taht
2022-10-24 17:34 ` Robert Chacón
2022-10-24 17:41 ` Herbert Wolverson
2022-10-24 17:42 ` Dave Taht
2022-10-24 17:46 ` dan
2022-10-24 17:57 ` Dave Taht
2022-10-24 18:03 ` dan
2022-10-24 18:06 ` Herbert Wolverson
2022-10-24 18:22 ` Dave Taht
2022-10-24 18:27 ` Dave Taht
2022-10-24 20:16 ` Robert Chacón
2022-10-24 20:31 ` Dave Taht
2022-10-24 20:49 ` Mark Steckel [this message]
2022-10-24 18:14 ` Dave Taht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/libreqos.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1840bc23065.e9b642741754104.1271754207271667701@phillywisper.net \
--to=mjs@phillywisper.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=robert.chacon@jackrabbitwireless.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox