Many ISPs need the kinds of quality shaping cake can do
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Steckel <mjs@phillywisper.net>
To: "Dave Taht" <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: libreqos <libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	"\"robert chacón\"" <robert.chacon@jackrabbitwireless.com>
Subject: Re: [LibreQoS] ookla speedtest results?
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 16:49:46 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1840bc23065.e9b642741754104.1271754207271667701@phillywisper.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw4q2_fyc78VCLL3yk1_AV3b8hvRrpR2pysaiXs2TbpLCw@mail.gmail.com>

I'm happy to send one of the TP-Link in-wall units to Robert if he wants to play with it.

Note - we are looking to deploy these in a 200 unit apartment building using rgnets.com to manage the networking, user accounts and billing via PPSK. (rgnets is pretty slick stuff!)

I would be even happier if OpenWRT supported PPSK but I'm fairly certain it doesn't (certainly not to the point to be useful for rgnets.com which is by need/use case).


 ---- On Mon, 24 Oct 2022 16:31:32 -0400  Dave Taht via LibreQoS  wrote --- 
 > On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 1:17 PM Robert Chacón
 > robert.chacon@jackrabbitwireless.com> wrote:
 > >
 > > Here's a customer on a 200/30 Mbps plan via Fixed Wireless.
 > > LibreQoS using cake diffserv4.
 > > LTU-LR is the client radio. Home WiFi is 802.11AC which is where most of the bloat comes from.
 > 
 > Yep! I'd like to collect a list of APs that are decent here, out of
 > the box. 40ms does not seem "bad".
 > 
 > It would be pretty cool to be able to A/B test one of these:
 > https://openwrt.org/toh/tp-link/eap615-wall
 > 
 > with stock vs openwrt vs my current openwrt branch, on a test like
 > this. I don't know enough about the
 > structure of speedtest and wifi is naturally jittery, but I was down
 > to 8ms induced latency on a variety of tests
 > on the mt76 chipset(s) before I put it down. (more important for wifi,
 > is multi-station loading)
 > 
 > Anyone fiddling with openwisp.org?
 > 
 > > When he tests by Ethernet bloat is 8ms instead of 40ms.
 > 
 > thanks very much! That's gorgeous!
 > 
 > https://www.speedtest.net/result/13846818812
 > 
 > I keep hoping speedtest are internally dissecting data from certain AS
 > numbers and going "woah!" WTF are they doing?
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > >
 > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 12:28 PM Dave Taht via LibreQoS libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
 > >>
 > >> Although I'm enjoying a good wide-ranging debate... is it possible one
 > >> or more of you could
 > >> take a speedtest.net test, click on results so you see the
 > >> "responsiveness" data, and post a screen shot?
 > >>
 > >> Perlease??
 > >> _______________________________________________
 > >> LibreQoS mailing list
 > >> LibreQoS@lists.bufferbloat.net
 > >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/libreqos
 > >
 > >
 > >
 > > --
 > > Robert Chacón
 > > CEO | JackRabbit Wireless LLC
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > -- 
 > This song goes out to all the folk that thought Stadia would work:
 > https://www.linkedin.com/posts/dtaht_the-mushroom-song-activity-6981366665607352320-FXtz
 > Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
 > _______________________________________________
 > LibreQoS mailing list
 > LibreQoS@lists.bufferbloat.net
 > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/libreqos
 > 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-24 20:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-24 13:51 Dave Taht
2022-10-24 14:01 ` Herbert Wolverson
2022-10-24 15:02   ` Robert Chacón
2022-10-24 15:09     ` Dave Taht
2022-10-24 15:20       ` dan
2022-10-24 15:27         ` Dave Taht
2022-10-24 15:31           ` dan
2022-10-24 16:30             ` Herbert Wolverson
2022-10-24 16:48               ` dan
2022-10-24 17:14                 ` Dave Taht
2022-10-24 17:30                   ` dan
2022-10-24 17:39                     ` Dave Taht
2022-10-24 17:34                   ` Robert Chacón
2022-10-24 17:41                     ` Herbert Wolverson
2022-10-24 17:42                     ` Dave Taht
2022-10-24 17:46                       ` dan
2022-10-24 17:57                         ` Dave Taht
2022-10-24 18:03                           ` dan
2022-10-24 18:06                             ` Herbert Wolverson
2022-10-24 18:22                               ` Dave Taht
2022-10-24 18:27                                 ` Dave Taht
2022-10-24 20:16                                   ` Robert Chacón
2022-10-24 20:31                                     ` Dave Taht
2022-10-24 20:49                                       ` Mark Steckel [this message]
2022-10-24 18:14                             ` Dave Taht

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/libreqos.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1840bc23065.e9b642741754104.1271754207271667701@phillywisper.net \
    --to=mjs@phillywisper.net \
    --cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=robert.chacon@jackrabbitwireless.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox