Many ISPs need the kinds of quality shaping cake can do
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>,
	Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>,
	libreqos <libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Cc: Dave Taht via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	Rpm <rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
	bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [LibreQoS] [Starlink] [Rpm] net neutrality back in the news
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 16:52:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A241A2C-4D92-4F6B-A155-27AF43675ECD@cable.comcast.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw4T_XGieTDH+oU8Z0beNkVLRS=d4-P=BiOKg_9=uH86dg@mail.gmail.com>

On 9/28/23, 12:45, "Starlink on behalf of Dave Taht via Starlink" <starlink-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net <mailto:starlink-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net> on behalf of starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net <mailto:starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>> wrote:
> It would be nice, if as a (dis)organisation... the bufferbloat team
could focus on somehow getting both sides of the network neutrality
debate deeplying understanding the technological problem their
pre-conceptions face, and the (now readily available and inexpensive)
solutions that could be deployed, by most ISPs, over a weekend. We are
regularly bringing up a few thousand people a week on libreqos (that
we know of), and then of course, there are all the home routers and
CPE that are increasingly capable of doing the right thing.

[JL] The FCC will soon (maybe today) open a notice of proposed rulemaking - aka NPRM. That process provides an opportunity for anyone to file and filings from technical experts are always highly valued. 





  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-28 16:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CAA93jw6Hex+piOSz2UygrUYcrCC8qoJA6NfL-vTtnZsP7o8N+g@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <C6D4C877-E633-4E4F-B3C2-59E5CDA2A2D4@gmx.de>
2023-09-28 16:38   ` [LibreQoS] " Dave Taht
2023-09-28 16:52     ` Livingood, Jason [this message]
2023-09-28 17:04       ` [LibreQoS] [Rpm] [Starlink] " rjmcmahon
2023-09-28 19:31     ` [LibreQoS] [Rpm] " Sebastian Moeller
2023-09-28 19:39       ` Dave Taht
2023-09-28 20:08         ` dan
2023-09-28 20:18           ` Dave Taht
2023-09-29 19:00             ` [LibreQoS] Getting Google to index. was:Re: [Starlink] " Rodney W. Grimes
2023-09-28 20:36           ` [LibreQoS] " Jeremy Austin
2023-09-28 20:54             ` [LibreQoS] [Bloat] " Livingood, Jason
2023-09-28 20:48           ` [LibreQoS] [Starlink] " Livingood, Jason
2023-09-28 22:19             ` [LibreQoS] [Bloat] " David Lang
2023-09-29  4:54               ` Jonathan Morton
2023-09-29 12:28                 ` [LibreQoS] [Rpm] [Bloat] [Starlink] " Rich Brown
2023-09-29 16:15                   ` dan
2023-09-30 12:00                     ` Frantisek Borsik
2023-09-30 12:19                       ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-09-30 12:42                         ` [LibreQoS] [Starlink] [Rpm] [Bloat] " Vint Cerf
2023-09-30 14:07                           ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-09-30 14:41                         ` [LibreQoS] [Rpm] [Bloat] [Starlink] " Mike Conlow
2023-09-30 15:20                           ` Sebastian Moeller
     [not found]                             ` <CAA93jw6TCoGifjUjXusYB=7tWYK+tpXW1f56QnhaXf20-WXx5g@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]                               ` <CAA93jw4gDK9ZP075KqgU=bdUS88zyGsuhATkV+Ft=1Mi_HYibQ@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]                                 ` <CAA93jw7+s_BuakPSD0ZNVCLxcurNPxcCvEz6Twov1M+rY-isjA@mail.gmail.com>
2023-09-30 22:03                                   ` [LibreQoS] Fwd: New email list: NNagain for network neutrality Dave Taht
2023-10-04 22:19                           ` [LibreQoS] [Bloat] [Rpm] [Starlink] net neutrality back in the news Michael Richardson
2023-09-29  6:24               ` [LibreQoS] [Rpm] [Bloat] " Sebastian Moeller
     [not found]                 ` <ZRZvMLtKhkd6-16m@Space.Net>
2023-09-29  7:07                   ` [LibreQoS] [Starlink] [Rpm] [Bloat] " Sebastian Moeller
2023-09-28 22:25           ` [LibreQoS] [Bloat] [Rpm] " David Lang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/libreqos.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3A241A2C-4D92-4F6B-A155-27AF43675ECD@cable.comcast.com \
    --to=jason_livingood@comcast.com \
    --cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=moeller0@gmx.de \
    --cc=rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox