From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BA043B29D for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2022 04:12:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 359DA5C0107 for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2022 04:12:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap48 ([10.202.2.98]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 03 Nov 2022 04:12:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= predictedpaths.nl; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1667463170; x=1667549570; bh=QHCgJr+JiTaLs6+egqktxxiC4 02epYUlkqiB0ispddU=; b=KF0BCh0mrUacPx2tGScQV1vmaaiMuhYeCFUuGT+4K VvuL9tQlug6JMtqtjyM2mOUyPlCbZ0vBZKIy9PXeey/qCYG4bfse7Ci0Pc2khfoU Y7jVoYvXLB1jAzu/534kPdO8M7fwXdbrlcOFIgtMtM4WZRgdfxrSVxzVAJ3AWD8d YYojjR0YXL41rqQtTkCwHFQAeqVo1A+ckZu7auzLB5oZW8634DNYtULO3wZARu0D URdZI7087JTylrCve7yd0TmacPPNbRElB9b20QZymrEaSNYSpZKPLGKz27/1ujdU 49sS1WpJqM44daZ9yRPg60iKlxPfGrqXorFxGxq7D6y/Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender :subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1667463170; x=1667549570; bh=Q HCgJr+JiTaLs6+egqktxxiC402epYUlkqiB0ispddU=; b=PZPxHXYjLkIaVyHT1 9xJ01yq8zHJHqj3htqCgzgG7FWqXxY2E7m3/sgxSkHioGa2rwcz65enu4w7WdY5+ nDtTLEKxQ7PVqJ2cbtKui/qAkT8U+bqMcaUhHEabUwV0F5Sq5M9L3WsnjNPzpb0+ wNTnV3NA6GpRD9kSH8WfPj07xZ1WSTvYFinIhvObX6/qkeVYwnlE4I7xl2lr/UiN qu17fLJ/ZkDh1r8FYJTR4G3C2a73oJq8ozgL9JuYNCHe1iOE5f174UScvDojlijo AIAVwd2/IZQRWrpcsYm9pJEF0G7Y8oxIgUpZgz0dJW/JY5INX6NeBvXOM+k3E+hY bocBg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvgedrudekgdduudeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtgfesth hqredtreerjeenucfhrhhomhepfdetrghrohhnucetrdcuifhlvghnnhdfuceorggrghes phhrvgguihgtthgvughprghthhhsrdhnlheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnheptddvvdfhue dvffeiiefhgfegteetudefffeggeekledugeehhffffffgveduhfetnecuvehluhhsthgv rhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheprggrghesphhrvgguihgtth gvughprghthhhsrdhnlh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: ia52947f9:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 0323431A0063; Thu, 3 Nov 2022 04:12:49 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.7.0-alpha0-1087-g968661d8e1-fm-20221021.001-g968661d8 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <44b8991b-5ec1-4b6c-ba1f-9d6de2a72114@app.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <054d5d78-980c-43d7-bf9c-8f0c63220be5@app.fastmail.com> Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2022 09:12:29 +0100 From: "Aaron A. Glenn" To: libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [LibreQoS] 100gbit open source smart nic X-BeenThere: libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Many ISPs need the kinds of quality shaping cake can do List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2022 08:12:50 -0000 On Thu, Nov 3, 2022, at 09:05, Dave Taht wrote: > > I'd settle for enough TCAM to interrupt the right processor to do the > shaping, fq and aqm. I hesitate to be ignorant in public but I don=E2=80=99t follow (how is T= CAM used in this scenario? and what=E2=80=99s the correct processor?) > What kind of pricing? I don=E2=80=99t get anything better than what colfax direct and terasic.= com.tw publicly post. >> -- >> Aaron A. Glenn >> Predicted Paths BV