From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <frank@carmickle.com>
Received: from bullseyemail.carmickle.com (bullseyemail.carmickle.com
 [IPv6:2600:3c03:e000:644:f03c:91ff:feee:b908])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA1013B2A4
 for <libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 11:13:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown
 [IPv6:2600:4040:5dba:7e00:c53d:f367:aa2b:de5e])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by bullseyemail.carmickle.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B8E85D06145
 for <libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 15:13:28 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=carmickle.com;
 s=2021081500; t=1689088408;
 h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
 to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
 bh=or9e7LOzdTHSHNcutfa/55IKKwc3oy+LF/unaHn3lE0=;
 b=gV35u36gh07UjX6Bpk8FNXL51P+4rQyo/aU9WjO4mmx3EBxIrFuYgLZD9fmUeCECY4G2q6
 BWbnHrimnhcZEXE+YkeBNBuo69qDcbCleUVpT1ZxUKubkunhTNxnGjm9VoFXcdnvG9SbR9
 TfA9I4ANuczp7G+myub9bRK/MdDYe+I=
From: Frank Carmickle <frank@carmickle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.600.7\))
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 11:13:27 -0400
References: <9579202856.3@informz.net>
 <CAA93jw4bWE28tPi855S1XKf5zSKKGJovECJFSntDvLVWLA7Enw@mail.gmail.com>
 <6D3D2EAA-88E9-4E0E-8967-AE33853B8F42@carmickle.com>
 <CACw=56Jbp0+sEtwuoU8y+N5mJ2-rWHK-K-kTYN9DgmqEkmtOAw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht via LibreQoS <libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net>
In-Reply-To: <CACw=56Jbp0+sEtwuoU8y+N5mJ2-rWHK-K-kTYN9DgmqEkmtOAw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-Id: <61385F96-B1B4-4FED-A035-7932905D30C4@carmickle.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.600.7)
Subject: Re: [LibreQoS] Got BEAD? Looking for a turnkey partner to help
 streamline the next steps?
X-BeenThere: libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Many ISPs need the kinds of quality shaping cake can do
 <libreqos.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/libreqos>,
 <mailto:libreqos-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/libreqos>
List-Post: <mailto:libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:libreqos-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/libreqos>,
 <mailto:libreqos-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 15:13:28 -0000

Jeremy,

> On Jul 11, 2023, at 11:09, Jeremy Austin <jeremy@aterlo.com> wrote:
>=20
>=20
>=20
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 7:01 AM Frank Carmickle via LibreQoS =
<libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> Dave,
>=20
> > On Jul 11, 2023, at 10:53, Dave Taht via LibreQoS =
<libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> >=20
> > I know everyone here hates paperwork as much or more than I do.
> >=20
> > ... but me, in particular, would really like to find an ONT that =
runs fq_codel natively I could recommend.
>=20
> Have you looked at SFP modules that do PON?=20
>=20
> https://www.fs.com/products/141199.html
>=20
> =
https://community.fs.com/blog/basic-knowledge-about-gpon-sfp-transceivers.=
html
>=20
> Can the the thermal envelope for an SFP truly accommodate traffic =
shaping? I=E2=80=99m thinking not at the current state of CPU art. Would =
be delighted to be wrong.

Certainly not. My point was that one could connect an SFP to a system =
that has a CPU where the shaping could be performed.

--FC


>=20
> Jeremy
> --=20
> Jeremy Austin
> Sr. Product Manager
> Preseem | Aterlo Networks
> Book a call: https://app.hubspot.com/meetings/jeremy548=20
> 1-833-773-7336 ext 718 | 1-907-803-5422
> jeremy@aterlo.com
> www.preseem.com
>     =20