From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf1-x435.google.com (mail-pf1-x435.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::435]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98A9D3CB37 for ; Wed, 1 May 2024 15:26:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x435.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-6f43015b763so85906b3a.0 for ; Wed, 01 May 2024 12:26:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ieee.org; s=google; t=1714591571; x=1715196371; darn=lists.bufferbloat.net; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=8O6TENuz9f3/tg92M8wQ+PFVAld1lrI3dbya92cOoHY=; b=OPQAOfKZ97R0FjAQZtgI07zm9HTsVnZlHSQrb5ZwXZmfB4aZg5INK19LOEN7E6KlxU 4uvz6OeziuFRmbhvKfjK/M21AIqCeY3o47u6pZlVZqaQDyTNfohXu3PxLrPk3riwLv4K veNklrQ9wgH02DnFMNbNLSaTE8d5C+pc7iT2w= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1714591571; x=1715196371; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=8O6TENuz9f3/tg92M8wQ+PFVAld1lrI3dbya92cOoHY=; b=wxScJaHNfH3yCz1fOPMEnPomrsBUesWVAdQZXml281VRuPqvUoUNnIir2+Dd5X6jgR UHPT3ZLShFDVumvu0mPsKHZOWfXHO/QCo96EZstRXVJj3YnhsI8tTzernWFBbaFazEwM d/h/SXaKudVaz254hfkbeOgNT37WQUPCMtH/jaXtXu0tUztcgwuCMHAZBnTwYV0EgxxZ 8vlQKvNOe6SxFMaJfVaX27na8oZN9q6JxWpNXRdalul5DLOkhzph2ClnGD4jYqExLRbT mWUvpN74TtNSF4YnjfuEDg5zIfF1ejFxNEBcPEjZwnCSqBNztb6AIAsbFq87Th1jZexC oOpw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCV9aimJZNMYBHyF75UH/ZCJFi2VhTGG2Pu5/T/GZK+6majPQO7gbiyHkPPuyCfq8fvejFcbl1X+JwQZ2ly/Q6k0yU5aNJAk2bLZvenyE8Q= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxdbW/8Bdx/ICNY2xYvg0RDSXY5z3qtq0vmjU6a6r0AVrn4zk5D LZnu+VF2I/l4AMhChc7dc4aawiUxsZSPvXp7M1FXj0m9klzdhjKloU62PcnLVw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGfs1HmLzmiw9Zjw5apCZvxc6Ac6LqWQf5uZ/pel8VgP5lJRFFntxC9PdaieE5KNkqoie4T/Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:2d23:b0:1a3:a821:f297 with SMTP id g35-20020a056a202d2300b001a3a821f297mr912008pzl.2.1714591571203; Wed, 01 May 2024 12:26:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpclient.apple (dhcp-72-253-194-45.hawaiiantel.net. [72.253.194.45]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id lr34-20020a056a0073a200b006e4e93f4f17sm22969614pfb.117.2024.05.01.12.26.10 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 01 May 2024 12:26:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Eugene Y Chang Message-Id: Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D9767F44-33B9-4880-A01A-E3636F9150E6"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.8\)) Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 09:26:08 -1000 In-Reply-To: Cc: Eugene Y Chang , Dave Taht , Dave Taht via Starlink , Colin_Higbie , libreqos To: Frantisek Borsik References: <1A972680-ECA5-42CA-BE8B-6BBD46FF5E74@ieee.org> <4B96B6C0-FB9A-40DD-9F04-F3F4FD18709E@ieee.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.8) Subject: Re: [LibreQoS] =?utf-8?b?W1N0YXJsaW5rXSBJdOKAmXMgdGhlIExhdGVuY3ksIEZD?= =?utf-8?q?C?= X-BeenThere: libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Many ISPs need the kinds of quality shaping cake can do List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 May 2024 19:26:12 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_D9767F44-33B9-4880-A01A-E3636F9150E6 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_394A225F-4AC5-4095-A3D6-A6DF550B9246" --Apple-Mail=_394A225F-4AC5-4095-A3D6-A6DF550B9246 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Pick up the glove? I can be part of a team. I am not as close as to the equipment as I used = to be. I need help assembling a demo configuration that can engage the = subscribers. Building a local team for this has been very slow going. I like helping a market #3 or #4 disrupt an incumbent. In most cases I = have seen, the #2 already has a game plan for competing with #1. A = distant #3 is usually the most hungry. Gene. ---------------------------------------------- Eugene Chang IEEE Life Senior Member IEEE Communications Society & Signal Processing Society, Hawaii Chapter Chair IEEE Life Member Affinity Group Hawaii Chair IEEE Entrepreneurship, Mentor eugene.chang@ieee.org m 781-799-0233 (in Honolulu) > On Apr 30, 2024, at 9:27 PM, Frantisek Borsik = wrote: >=20 > Basically, Eugene, the situation you are describing is calling for a = competitor to disrupt them! >=20 > This is such an old story - so many ISPs, especially WIPSs, started = just because they either didn't have any option or all those options = available were really terrible. >=20 > Don't you want to pick up the glove? :P >=20 > All the best, >=20 > Frank >=20 > Frantisek (Frank) Borsik >=20 >=20 >=20 > https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik = > Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp: +421919416714 >=20 > iMessage, mobile: +420775230885 >=20 > Skype: casioa5302ca >=20 > frantisek.borsik@gmail.com >=20 > On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 11:53=E2=80=AFPM Eugene Y Chang = > wrote: > Frank, > Thank you. What you suggest makes sense if it was objective! >=20 > In my neighborhood, the ISP=E2=80=99s organization will feel they have = nothing to learn from outsiders. (Worst, both major ISPs are just a = subsidiary of another organization. They just implement corporate = standards. The local managers are not motivated to deviate from their = corporate marching orders.) >=20 > A public promotion (campaign) of modern best practices is needed. Then = I need to have this campaign spill over to the subscriber community. The = business community needs to be educated that their productivity will = improve. The social leaders need to learn that their community will get = better service. Then, and only then, can I see the ISP feeling the need = to improve. It helps if the improvement is just open-source software on = their hardware investment. >=20 >=20 > Gene > ---------------------------------------------- > Eugene Chang > IEEE Life Senior Member >=20 >=20 >=20 >> On Apr 30, 2024, at 11:35 AM, Frantisek Borsik = > wrote: >>=20 >> Eugene - the easiest thing in the case of your ISP would be tell him = about us: https://libreqos.io >>=20 >> He can take a look on it, join our support chat and get help if he = won't be able to get it up and running: = https://chat.libreqos.io/join/fvu3cerayyaumo377xwvpev6/ = >>=20 >> But most of the ISPs don't need to talk with us at all, it's easy to = deploy. >>=20 >>=20 >> All the best, >>=20 >> Frank >>=20 >> Frantisek (Frank) Borsik >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik = >> Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp: +421919416714 >>=20 >> iMessage, mobile: +420775230885 >>=20 >> Skype: casioa5302ca >>=20 >> frantisek.borsik@gmail.com >>=20 >> On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 11:22=E2=80=AFPM Eugene Y Chang via Starlink = > = wrote: >> OK. I need help teaching my ISPs that they can do this without = threatening their business model. >> Who can help me? >>=20 >> A public demo? Yes! Are you saying that if our (my) neighborhood ISP = adopted the lessons from the public demo, most of the latency issues = would be solved? What won=E2=80=99t get fixed? How do we make this a = widely adopted best practice? Am I crying over issues that are already = fixed? Does this simplify the issues at the FCC? >>=20 >> Gene >> ---------------------------------------------- >> Eugene Chang >> IEEE Life Senior Member >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>> On Apr 30, 2024, at 11:07 AM, Dave Taht > wrote: >>>=20 >>> Just fq codel or cake everything and you get all that. >>>=20 >>> Libreqos is free software for those that do not want to update their = data plane. Perhaps we should do a public demo of what it can do for = every tech on the planet. Dsl benefits, fiber does also (but it is the = stats that matter more on fiber because the customer wifi becomes = bloated) >>>=20 >>> Starlink merely fq codeled their wifi and did some aqm work (not = codel I think) to get the amazing results they are getting today. I = don't have the waveform test results handy but they are amazing. I feel = a sea change in the wind... >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2024, 12:51=E2=80=AFPM Eugene Y Chang via Starlink = > = wrote: >>> Colin, >>> I am overwhelmed with all the reasons that prevent low(er) or = consistent latency. >>> I think that our best ISP offerings should deliver graceful, agile, = or nimble service. Sure, handle all the high-volume data. The = high-volume service just shouldn=E2=80=99t preclude graceful service. = Yes, the current ISP practices fall short. Can we help them improve = their service? >>>=20 >>> Am I asking too much? >>>=20 >>> Gene >>> ---------------------------------------------- >>> Eugene Chang >>> IEEE Life Senior Member >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>> On Apr 30, 2024, at 9:31 AM, Colin_Higbie via Starlink = > = wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> Gene, >>>>=20 >>>> I think the lion's share of other people (many brilliant people = here) on this thread are focused on keeping latency down when under = load. I generally just read and don't contribute on those discussions, = because that's not my area of expertise. I only posted my point on = bandwidth, not to detract from the importance of reducing latency, but = to correct what I believed to be an important error on minimum bandwidth = required to be able to perform standard Internet functions. >>>>=20 >>>> To my surprise, there was pushback on the figure, so I've responded = to try to educate this group on streaming usage in the hope that the = people working on the latency problem under load (core reason for this = group to exist) can also be aware of the minimum bandwidth needs to = ensure they don't plan based on bad assumptions. >>>>=20 >>>> For a single user, minimum bandwidth (independent of latency) needs = to be at least 25Mbps assuming the goal is to provide access to all = standard Internet services. Anything short of that will deny users = access to the primary streaming services, and more specifically won't be = able to watch 4K HDR video, which is the market standard for streaming = services today and likely will remain at that level for the next several = years. >>>>=20 >>>> I think it's fine to offer lower-cost options that don't deliver 4K = HDR video (not everyone cares about that), but at least 25Mbps should be = available to an Internet customer for any new Internet service rollout. >>>>=20 >>>> Cheers, >>>> Colin >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Starlink > On Behalf Of = starlink-request@lists.bufferbloat.net = >>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2024 3:05 PM >>>> To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net = >>>> Subject: Starlink Digest, Vol 37, Issue 15 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> = ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>=20 >>>> Message: 1 >>>> Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 09:04:43 -1000 >>>> From: Eugene Y Chang > >>>> To: Colin_Higbie >, Dave Taht via Starlink >>>> > >>>> Subject: Re: [Starlink] It=E2=80=99s the Latency, FCC >>>> Message-ID: <438B1BC4-D465-497A-B6BA-700E1D411036@ieee.org = > >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"utf-8" >>>>=20 >>>> I am always surprised how complicated these discussions become. = (Surprised mostly because I forgot the kind of issues this community = care about.) The discussion doesn=E2=80=99t shed light on the following = scenarios. >>>>=20 >>>> While watching stream content, activating controls needed to switch = content sometimes (often?) have long pauses. I attribute that to buffer = bloat and high latency. >>>>=20 >>>> With a happy household user watching streaming media, a second user = could have terrible shopping experience with Amazon. The interactive = response could be (is often) horrible. (Personally, I would be doing = email and working on a shared doc. The Amazon analogy probably applies = to more people.) >>>>=20 >>>> How can we deliver graceful performance to both persons in a = household? >>>> Is seeking graceful performance too complicated to improve? >>>> (I said =E2=80=9Cgraceful=E2=80=9D to allow technical flexibility.) >>>>=20 >>>> Gene >>>> ---------------------------------------------- >>>> Eugene Chang >>>>=20 >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Starlink mailing list >>>> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net = >>>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink = >>>=20 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Starlink mailing list >>> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net = >>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink = >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> Starlink mailing list >> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net = >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink = >=20 --Apple-Mail=_394A225F-4AC5-4095-A3D6-A6DF550B9246 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Pick = up the glove? 
I can be part of a team. I am not as = close as to the equipment as I used to be.
I need = help assembling a demo configuration that can engage the = subscribers.
Building a local team for this has = been very slow going. 

I like helping a market #3 or #4 disrupt an incumbent. In = most cases I have seen, the #2 already has a game plan for competing = with #1. A distant #3 is usually the most hungry.

Gene.
----------------------------------------------
Eugene Chang
IEEE Life Senior Member
IEEE = Communications Society & Signal Processing Society,    
    Hawaii Chapter Chair
IEEE Life Member = Affinity Group Hawaii Chair
IEEE Entrepreneurship, Mentor
eugene.chang@ieee.org
m 781-799-0233 (in = Honolulu)



On Apr 30, 2024, at 9:27 PM, Frantisek Borsik <frantisek.borsik@gmail.com> wrote:

Basically, Eugene, the situation you are describing is = calling for a competitor to disrupt them!

This is such an old story - so many = ISPs, especially WIPSs, started just because they either didn't have any = option or all those options available were really terrible.

Don't you want to pick = up the glove? :P

All the best,

Frank

Frantisek (Frank) Borsik

 

https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik

Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp: = +421919416714 

iMessage, mobile: = +420775230885

Skype: casioa5302ca

frantisek.borsik@gmail.com



On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 11:53=E2=80=AFPM = Eugene Y Chang <eugene.chang@ieee.org> wrote:
Frank,
Thank you. What you suggest makes = sense if it was objective!

In my neighborhood, the ISP=E2=80=99s organization will feel = they have nothing to learn from outsiders. (Worst, both major ISPs are = just a subsidiary of another organization. They just implement corporate = standards. The local managers are not motivated to deviate from their = corporate marching orders.)

A public promotion (campaign) of modern best practices is = needed. Then I need to have this campaign spill over to the subscriber = community. The business community needs to be educated that their = productivity will improve. The social leaders need to learn that their = community will get better service. Then, and only then, can I see the = ISP feeling the need to improve. It helps if the improvement is just = open-source software on their hardware investment.


Gene
----------------------------------------------
Eugene Chang
IEEE Life Senior = Member



On Apr 30, 2024, at 11:35 AM, Frantisek Borsik <frantisek.borsik@gmail.com> wrote:

Eugene - the = easiest thing in the case of your ISP would be tell him about us: https://libreqos.io

He can take a look on it, join our = support chat and get help if he won't be able to get it up and = running: https://chat.libreqos.io/join/fvu3cerayyaumo377xwvpev6/

But most of the = ISPs don't need to talk with us at all, it's easy to deploy.


All the = best,

Frank

Frantisek (Frank) = Borsik

 

https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik

Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp: = +421919416714 

iMessage, mobile: = +420775230885

Skype: casioa5302ca

frantisek.borsik@gmail.com



On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 11:22=E2=80=AFPM = Eugene Y Chang via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
OK. I need help teaching my ISPs that they can do this = without threatening their business model.
Who can help = me?

A public = demo? Yes! Are you saying that if our (my) neighborhood ISP adopted the = lessons from the public demo, most of the latency issues would be = solved? What won=E2=80=99t get fixed? How do we make this a widely = adopted best practice? Am I crying over issues that are already fixed? = Does this simplify the issues at the FCC?

Gene
----------------------------------------------
Eugene Chang
IEEE Life Senior = Member




On Apr 30, 2024, at 11:07 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:

Just fq codel or cake everything = and you get all that.

Libreqos is free software = for those that do not want to update their data plane. Perhaps we should = do a public demo of what it can do for every tech on the planet. Dsl = benefits, fiber does also (but it is the stats that matter more on fiber = because the customer wifi becomes bloated)

Starlink = merely fq codeled their wifi and did some aqm work (not codel I think) = to get the amazing results they are getting today. I don't have the = waveform test results handy but they are amazing. I feel a sea change in = the wind...



On Tue, Apr = 30, 2024, 12:51=E2=80=AFPM Eugene Y Chang via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
Colin,
I am overwhelmed with all the reasons = that prevent low(er) or consistent latency.
I think = that our best ISP offerings should deliver graceful, agile, or nimble = service. Sure, handle all the high-volume data. The high-volume service = just shouldn=E2=80=99t preclude graceful service. Yes, the current ISP = practices fall short. Can we help them improve their service?

Am I asking too = much?

Gene
----------------------------------------------
Eugene Chang
IEEE Life Senior = Member




On Apr 30, 2024, at 9:31 AM, Colin_Higbie via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> = wrote:

Gene,

I think the lion's share of other people (many = brilliant people here) on this thread are focused on keeping latency = down when under load. I generally just read and don't contribute on = those discussions, because that's not my area of expertise. I only = posted my point on bandwidth, not to detract from the importance of = reducing latency, but to correct what I believed to be an important = error on minimum bandwidth required to be able to perform standard = Internet functions.

To my surprise, there = was pushback on the figure, so I've responded to try to educate this = group on streaming usage in the hope that the people working on the = latency problem under load (core reason for this group to exist) can = also be aware of the minimum bandwidth needs to ensure they don't plan = based on bad assumptions.

For a single = user, minimum bandwidth (independent of latency) needs to be at least = 25Mbps assuming the goal is to provide access to all standard Internet = services. Anything short of that will deny users access to the primary = streaming services, and more specifically won't be able to watch 4K HDR = video, which is the market standard for streaming services today and = likely will remain at that level for the next several years.

I think it's fine to offer lower-cost options = that don't deliver 4K HDR video (not everyone cares about that), but at = least 25Mbps should be available to an Internet customer for any new = Internet service rollout.

Cheers,
Colin


-----Original= Message-----
From: Starlink <starlink-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net> On Behalf Of = starlink-request@lists.bufferbloat.net
Sent: = Tuesday, April 30, 2024 3:05 PM
To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Starlink Digest, Vol 37, Issue 15


---------------------------------------------------------------= -------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, = 30 Apr 2024 09:04:43 -1000
From: Eugene Y Chang <eugene.chang@ieee.org>
To: Colin_Higbie = <CHigbie1@Higbie.name>, Dave Taht via = Starlink
= <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: = Re: [Starlink] It=E2=80=99s the Latency, FCC
Message-ID: = <438B1BC4-D465-497A-B6BA-700E1D411036@ieee.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"utf-8"

I am always surprised how complicated these discussions = become. (Surprised mostly because I forgot the kind of issues this = community care about.) The discussion doesn=E2=80=99t shed light on the = following scenarios.

While watching stream = content, activating controls needed to switch content sometimes (often?) = have long pauses. I attribute that to buffer bloat and high latency.

With a happy household user watching streaming = media, a second user could have terrible shopping experience with = Amazon. The interactive response could be (is often) horrible. = (Personally, I would be doing email and working on a shared doc. The = Amazon analogy probably applies to more people.)

How can we deliver graceful performance to both persons in a = household?
Is seeking graceful performance too complicated = to improve?
(I said =E2=80=9Cgraceful=E2=80=9D to allow = technical flexibility.)

Gene
----------------------------------------------
Eugene Chang

_______________________________________________
Starlink mailing list
Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink

_______________________________________________
Starlink mailing list
Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink

_______________________________________________
Starlink mailing list
Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink


= --Apple-Mail=_394A225F-4AC5-4095-A3D6-A6DF550B9246-- --Apple-Mail=_D9767F44-33B9-4880-A01A-E3636F9150E6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEERPTGiBqcibajhTSsv0/8FiYdKmAFAmYyl1AACgkQv0/8FiYd KmCGGhAAwsYDri/qpefFzd2MI5D9KVv6/n98zbuMTfs5DlXckEhdBZDPL49U3Cde C3BcekmWNLWnnzpzMZem24UzmZm1qb3lwqRB8rfjMU+dGIyzK83Zai0NYka4jC/v sFwkw0LOvvWG0qejNgAawvRMAtEbFRRmi7bof7gQ6o9qJJZALXT6btWYJnGS7ca+ /fJPBHSKN3Wye//Qst61NZ+F98npwl7nRFDlXB+88s952rU0+UCcW4K2WbBGk+tc S91qKuB52N7Kz6HgtTk/wtMEgZ8wiogcostrgKZGQM1wEgVdbUYp9xq3EH3sna+G WAkcB6Nw7+a5HkFyd1gkRE2L1ouOzQbRpsDomBxLJhTJTV6T++0liVCM5eeN99Ht 9nAjRc/+K8gSK5fqyNqWD9I5in0rUOUngzLAzGQ6Z+n7usGLo+7CqrVv0h6ZG54h mnOaUpAgF9C7JarNg9DHVWVGCFY//eex5hXo0oLV+VkyHVCAJS67lGsIbPdSdw1b WbTru0zlueRBgYqr91y4zB8jLAVy1IuqebVWiJ9DjpiFdz3S9XFku/yhEQkd0mNn TowUR1zWImsxq9jJxmD0ztLBr/pShhwLOfZTQ8Zl3ErLm3ZfvxIbrkZm52lz80PZ sv0mwT8/nhWHvQYVHQ56AQhHaOiOzOnVZAAwkteYkeuhryl/2FA= =F2zv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_D9767F44-33B9-4880-A01A-E3636F9150E6--