From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg1-x52c.google.com (mail-pg1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B7973B29E for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 10:02:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id h185so8735260pgc.10 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 07:02:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=CaOV+4kFoMADTRp5EY9SOekZknr/lcVbiVBF8Cy3jn0=; b=ngVCpRofEq83ZOJbxJ2DlNOwLn+i5YhOFw/n6OVCJktFEyJ6yZCoYNt79ON5P/Gnbh gnjiu+n3bo9hXbfv1KfLBTIHqdRQoEbe8Y3rW19D6RWjUX/qW3SY4DyYKRmq86DNn0ia npTggrHeMXw1j05CqAoaRXIp9P7/mqgeKDXlwyxIn6aZQseX/7iFRdPH/I67pAznYT2K fA8HptgG8ahtp5d0aOEfy7bPg5u28I60/ahwTCDUgHG8BUgmMMBLHJ2ibwEoaGefNu1v Nu/Vgg9kNpj4/kPdku1D4NAPtMOEDgTVWYpjM+msfnj0bBueqqW0kAH2Ly7pkHOYWtGq ZFWw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=CaOV+4kFoMADTRp5EY9SOekZknr/lcVbiVBF8Cy3jn0=; b=LRBLZISRzFldaCv2bRlrCvLa0S+OyU6wDX3FEFcyeoz84aTMYJMwH/3M1plgywDXGU Zc+65vPbT+mnirySBzjr798NSlTqUbSDCu6iCvpMhUgCuCCXsGT5hD0yEgaSObNRziyx NKlURa6Ds52o8GCQjNlD7a04gJT6k5X3XPxXnEIdQSCy0t6MEvTDcxg6zXx9e3XFAb1z m8tVs80nFgZ+O4nzngbIWWwdoGvcx4xGET+yWd8fTTH5Pp1aXDXmswfSA1eX/yIII/Sp Qpwdjt4tCbquVQtGFmBsJ0LVBF6JLUZDKj7a38sQ1kWg9zowxHtzmVyuc29LydEFf0Vw hmLw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2B9UsI9NpYyL7hnKNEvSTLLnmDguxqRiiiTC5PCdELdzYxU1Xm cZmiyyj3+je1l5LSF3M5Ow+zwgGHuP/+uH8WuS0Yh/6P X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5phOZa70yIio2s3bPLY7dcfPR7hEiBDCOTylcWySGuVL4lOGZEyNgxTFEP8QeR97t94mzFZn/60Wt+t6LBsjA= X-Received: by 2002:a65:6e0e:0:b0:434:59e0:27d3 with SMTP id bd14-20020a656e0e000000b0043459e027d3mr27502990pgb.185.1666620126295; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 07:02:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Herbert Wolverson Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 09:01:55 -0500 Message-ID: Cc: libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009a7a3f05ebc83c45" Subject: Re: [LibreQoS] ookla speedtest results? X-BeenThere: libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Many ISPs need the kinds of quality shaping cake can do List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 14:02:07 -0000 --0000000000009a7a3f05ebc83c45 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Are you looking for a shaped result? That'll show "whatever bandwidth is left on the sector" without Libre, and around the customer's paid-for target with Libre (hopefully!). One thing Preseem does well is that their onboarding process includes "leave it in monitoring-only mode" for a week, gathering data before you pull the switch (although most ISPs I've talked to just pull the switch...) It's quite enlightening to see a before/after, even with only FQ_CODEL as the shaper. We could probably do something similar with a "monitor only" mode that doesn't enable any queues (is there a TC equivalent to "dummy" on FreeBSD?). On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 8:52 AM Dave Taht via LibreQoS < libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote: > I am curious if anyone here has speedtest results with libreqos on and > off, and can send a screen shot? > > -- > This song goes out to all the folk that thought Stadia would work: > > https://www.linkedin.com/posts/dtaht_the-mushroom-song-activity-698136666= 5607352320-FXtz > Dave T=C3=A4ht CEO, TekLibre, LLC > _______________________________________________ > LibreQoS mailing list > LibreQoS@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/libreqos > --0000000000009a7a3f05ebc83c45 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Are you looking for a shaped result? That'll show= "whatever bandwidth
is left on the sector" without Lib= re, and around the customer's paid-for
target with Libre= (hopefully!).

One thing Preseem does well is that= their onboarding process includes
"leave it in monitoring-o= nly mode" for a week, gathering data before you
pull the swi= tch (although most ISPs I've talked to just pull the switch...)
It's quite enlightening to see a before/after, even with only FQ_COD= EL
as the shaper.

We could probably do s= omething similar with a "monitor only" mode that
doesn&= #39;t enable any queues (is there a TC equivalent to "dummy" on
FreeBSD?).

On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 8:52 AM Dave Taht via= LibreQoS <libreqos@li= sts.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
I am curious if anyone here has speedtest results with l= ibreqos on and
off, and can send a screen shot?

--
This song goes out to all the folk that thought Stadia would work:
https://www.= linkedin.com/posts/dtaht_the-mushroom-song-activity-6981366665607352320-FXt= z
Dave T=C3=A4ht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
_______________________________________________
LibreQoS mailing list
LibreQo= S@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/libreqos
--0000000000009a7a3f05ebc83c45--