From: Herbert Wolverson <herberticus@gmail.com>
To: libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: [LibreQoS] Ack-filtering
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 16:19:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+erpM5A9FM_rkubOiOCT_d0UAUar_Sw=jwOVb3RDTWcztvXRw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1287 bytes --]
Highly un-scientific (we need to let it run for a bit and do a proper
before-after comparison that includes a decent timeframe), but I like the
quick'n'dirty results of testing "ack-filter":
[image: image.png]
We've been having a Bad Network Day (TM), with sudden flooding making us
use some pretty constrained - so our latencies were *really* suffering in
one region. That region just happens to be the worst part of our network
(we haven't finished digesting an acquisition; there's even Bullet M2 omnis
up there!). Lots of relatively low-speed plans, all with big variance
(10/3, 25/5, I found a 5/1 that someone forgot to upgrade!). They seem to
have benefitted greatly. The parts of the network that were doing great -
are still doing great, with very little change.
Just a quick'n'dirty test. I'll try and put something more useful together
tomorrow, when it's had a chance to see how peak time hits it.
(Also, this digging revealed an issue with pping-cpumap in production. It
wasn't tracking enough flows, so the reporting is heavily biased towards
the top-consumers - who are likely to be monitored before the buffer fills
up and it stops counting until stats are read. So I added a "maximums.h"
file to make it easy to set user limits, and made flow-count derive from
that.)
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1512 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: image.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 375873 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2022-10-24 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-24 21:19 Herbert Wolverson [this message]
2022-10-24 21:48 ` Dave Taht
2022-10-24 21:57 ` Dave Taht
2022-10-24 22:58 ` Herbert Wolverson
2022-10-24 23:05 ` [LibreQoS] Rain Fade (was Ack-filtering) Dave Taht
2022-10-24 23:25 ` dan
2022-10-25 0:43 ` Mark Steckel
2022-10-25 13:25 ` dan
2022-10-25 13:43 ` Herbert Wolverson
2022-10-25 13:58 ` dan
2022-10-25 16:56 ` Dave Taht
2022-10-26 2:22 ` dan
2022-10-26 2:28 ` [LibreQoS] 10G radios Was: " Mark Steckel
2022-10-26 4:09 ` dan
2022-10-26 12:57 ` Mark Steckel
2022-10-26 13:02 ` Herbert Wolverson
2022-10-26 15:02 ` dan
2022-10-26 3:26 ` [LibreQoS] " Dave Taht
2022-10-26 13:27 ` Herbert Wolverson
2022-10-26 14:52 ` dan
2022-10-24 23:25 ` Herbert Wolverson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/libreqos.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+erpM5A9FM_rkubOiOCT_d0UAUar_Sw=jwOVb3RDTWcztvXRw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=herberticus@gmail.com \
--cc=libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox