Many ISPs need the kinds of quality shaping cake can do
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Herbert Wolverson <herberticus@gmail.com>
To: libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: [LibreQoS] Ack-filtering
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 16:19:39 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+erpM5A9FM_rkubOiOCT_d0UAUar_Sw=jwOVb3RDTWcztvXRw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1287 bytes --]

Highly un-scientific (we need to let it run for a bit and do a proper
before-after comparison that includes a decent timeframe), but I like the
quick'n'dirty results of testing "ack-filter":
[image: image.png]
We've been having a Bad Network Day (TM), with sudden flooding making us
use some pretty constrained - so our latencies were *really* suffering in
one region. That region just happens to be the worst part of our network
(we haven't finished digesting an acquisition; there's even Bullet M2 omnis
up there!). Lots of relatively low-speed plans, all with big variance
(10/3, 25/5, I found a 5/1 that someone forgot to upgrade!). They seem to
have benefitted greatly. The parts of the network that were doing great -
are still doing great, with very little change.

Just a quick'n'dirty test. I'll try and put something more useful together
tomorrow, when it's had a chance to see how peak time hits it.

(Also, this digging revealed an issue with pping-cpumap in production. It
wasn't tracking enough flows, so the reporting is heavily biased towards
the top-consumers - who are likely to be monitored before the buffer fills
up and it stops counting until stats are read. So I added a "maximums.h"
file to make it easy to set user limits, and made flow-count derive from
that.)

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1512 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: image.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 375873 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2022-10-24 21:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-24 21:19 Herbert Wolverson [this message]
2022-10-24 21:48 ` Dave Taht
2022-10-24 21:57 ` Dave Taht
2022-10-24 22:58   ` Herbert Wolverson
2022-10-24 23:05     ` [LibreQoS] Rain Fade (was Ack-filtering) Dave Taht
2022-10-24 23:25       ` dan
2022-10-25  0:43         ` Mark Steckel
2022-10-25 13:25           ` dan
2022-10-25 13:43             ` Herbert Wolverson
2022-10-25 13:58               ` dan
2022-10-25 16:56         ` Dave Taht
2022-10-26  2:22           ` dan
2022-10-26  2:28             ` [LibreQoS] 10G radios Was: " Mark Steckel
2022-10-26  4:09               ` dan
2022-10-26 12:57                 ` Mark Steckel
2022-10-26 13:02                 ` Herbert Wolverson
2022-10-26 15:02                   ` dan
2022-10-26  3:26             ` [LibreQoS] " Dave Taht
2022-10-26 13:27               ` Herbert Wolverson
2022-10-26 14:52                 ` dan
2022-10-24 23:25       ` Herbert Wolverson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/libreqos.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CA+erpM5A9FM_rkubOiOCT_d0UAUar_Sw=jwOVb3RDTWcztvXRw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=herberticus@gmail.com \
    --cc=libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox