* [LibreQoS] Fwd: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/1] bpf, docs: BPF Iterator Document
[not found] ` <20221202221710.320810-2-ssreevani@meta.com>
@ 2022-12-05 0:14 ` Dave Taht
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Dave Taht @ 2022-12-05 0:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libreqos
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Sreevani Sreejith <ssreevani@meta.com>
Date: Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 2:34 PM
Subject: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/1] bpf, docs: BPF Iterator Document
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<ast@kernel.org>, <andrii@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
<psreep@gmail.com>
Cc: <void@manifault.com>, <yhs@meta.com>, <mykolal@meta.com>
From: Sreevani Sreejith <psreep@gmail.com>
Document that describes how BPF iterators work, how to use iterators,
and how to pass parameters in BPF iterators.
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Signed-off-by: Sreevani Sreejith <psreep@gmail.com>
---
Documentation/bpf/bpf_iterators.rst | 485 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Documentation/bpf/index.rst | 1 +
2 files changed, 486 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/bpf/bpf_iterators.rst
diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/bpf_iterators.rst
b/Documentation/bpf/bpf_iterators.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..6d7770793fab
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/bpf/bpf_iterators.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,485 @@
+=============
+BPF Iterators
+=============
+
+
+----------
+Motivation
+----------
+
+There are a few existing ways to dump kernel data into user space. The most
+popular one is the ``/proc`` system. For example, ``cat /proc/net/tcp6`` dumps
+all tcp6 sockets in the system, and ``cat /proc/net/netlink`` dumps all netlink
+sockets in the system. However, their output format tends to be fixed, and if
+users want more information about these sockets, they have to patch the kernel,
+which often takes time to publish upstream and release. The same is
true for popular
+tools like `ss <https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man8/ss.8.html>`_ where any
+additional information needs a kernel patch.
+
+To solve this problem, the `drgn
+<https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/bpf/drgn.html>`_ tool is often used to
+dig out the kernel data with no kernel change. However, the main drawback for
+drgn is performance, as it cannot do pointer tracing inside the kernel. In
+addition, drgn cannot validate a pointer value and may read invalid data if the
+pointer becomes invalid inside the kernel.
+
+The BPF iterator solves the above problem by providing flexibility on what data
+(e.g., tasks, bpf_maps, etc.) to collect by calling BPF programs for
each kernel
+data object.
+
+----------------------
+How BPF Iterators Work
+----------------------
+
+A BPF iterator is a type of BPF program that allows users to iterate over
+specific types of kernel objects. Unlike traditional BPF tracing programs that
+allow users to define callbacks that are invoked at particular points of
+execution in the kernel, BPF iterators allow users to define callbacks that
+should be executed for every entry in a variety of kernel data structures.
+
+For example, users can define a BPF iterator that iterates over every task on
+the system and dumps the total amount of CPU runtime currently used by each of
+them. Another BPF task iterator may instead dump the cgroup
information for each
+task. Such flexibility is the core value of BPF iterators.
+
+A BPF program is always loaded into the kernel at the behest of a user space
+process. A user space process loads a BPF program by opening and initializing
+the program skeleton as required and then invoking a syscall to have the BPF
+program verified and loaded by the kernel.
+
+In traditional tracing programs, a program is activated by having user space
+obtain a ``bpf_link`` to the program with ``bpf_program__attach()``. Once
+activated, the program callback will be invoked whenever the tracepoint is
+triggered in the main kernel. For BPF iterator programs, a ``bpf_link`` to the
+program is obtained using ``bpf_link_create()``, and the program callback is
+invoked by issuing system calls from user space.
+
+Next, let us see how you can use the iterators to iterate on kernel objects and
+read data.
+
+------------------------
+How to Use BPF iterators
+------------------------
+
+BPF selftests are a great resource to illustrate how to use the iterators. In
+this section, we’ll walk through a BPF selftest which shows how to load and use
+a BPF iterator program. To begin, we’ll look at `bpf_iter.c
+<https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git/tree/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c>`_,
+which illustrates how to load and trigger BPF iterators on the user space side.
+Later, we’ll look at a BPF program that runs in kernel space.
+
+Loading a BPF iterator in the kernel from user space typically involves the
+following steps:
+
+* The BPF program is loaded into the kernel through ``libbpf``. Once the kernel
+ has verified and loaded the program, it returns a file descriptor
(fd) to user
+ space.
+* Obtain a ``link_fd`` to the BPF program by calling the ``bpf_link_create()``
+ specified with the BPF program file descriptor received from the kernel.
+* Next, obtain a BPF iterator file descriptor (``bpf_iter_fd``) by calling the
+ ``bpf_iter_create()`` specified with the ``bpf_link`` received from Step 2.
+* Trigger the iteration by calling ``read(bpf_iter_fd)`` until no data is
+ available.
+* Close the iterator fd using ``close(bpf_iter_fd)``.
+* If needed to reread the data, get a new ``bpf_iter_fd`` and do the
read again.
+
+The following are a few examples of selftest BPF iterator programs:
+
+* `bpf_iter_tcp4.c
<https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git/tree/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_tcp4.c>`_
+* `bpf_iter_task_vma.c
<https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git/tree/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_task_vma.c>`_
+* `bpf_iter_task_file.c
<https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git/tree/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_task_file.c>`_
+
+Let us look at ``bpf_iter_task_file.c``, which runs in kernel space:
+
+Here is the definition of ``bpf_iter__task_file`` in `vmlinux.h
+<https://facebookmicrosites.github.io/bpf/blog/2020/02/19/bpf-portability-and-co-re.html#btf>`_.
+Any struct name in ``vmlinux.h`` in the format ``bpf_iter__<iter_name>``
+represents a BPF iterator. The suffix ``<iter_name>`` represents the type of
+iterator.
+
+::
+
+ struct bpf_iter__task_file {
+ union {
+ struct bpf_iter_meta *meta;
+ };
+ union {
+ struct task_struct *task;
+ };
+ u32 fd;
+ union {
+ struct file *file;
+ };
+ };
+
+In the above code, the field 'meta' contains the metadata, which is
the same for
+all BPF iterator programs. The rest of the fields are specific to different
+iterators. For example, for task_file iterators, the kernel layer provides the
+'task', 'fd' and 'file' field values. The 'task' and 'file' are `reference
+counted
+<https://facebookmicrosites.github.io/bpf/blog/2018/08/31/object-lifetime.html#file-descriptors-and-reference-counters>`_,
+so they won't go away when the BPF program runs.
+
+Here is a snippet from the ``bpf_iter_task_file.c`` file:
+
+::
+
+ SEC("iter/task_file")
+ int dump_task_file(struct bpf_iter__task_file *ctx)
+ {
+ struct seq_file *seq = ctx->meta->seq;
+ struct task_struct *task = ctx->task;
+ struct file *file = ctx->file;
+ __u32 fd = ctx->fd;
+
+ if (task == NULL || file == NULL)
+ return 0;
+
+ if (ctx->meta->seq_num == 0) {
+ count = 0;
+ BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, " tgid gid fd file\n");
+ }
+
+ if (tgid == task->tgid && task->tgid != task->pid)
+ count++;
+
+ if (last_tgid != task->tgid) {
+ last_tgid = task->tgid;
+ unique_tgid_count++;
+ }
+
+ BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "%8d %8d %8d %lx\n", task->tgid, task->pid, fd,
+ (long)file->f_op);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+In the above example, the section name ``SEC(iter/task_file)``, indicates that
+the program is a BPF iterator program to iterate all files from all tasks. The
+context of the program is ``bpf_iter__task_file`` struct.
+
+The user space program invokes the BPF iterator program running in the kernel
+by issuing a ``read()`` syscall. Once invoked, the BPF
+program can export data to user space using a variety of BPF helper functions.
+You can use either ``bpf_seq_printf()`` (and BPF_SEQ_PRINTF helper macro) or
+``bpf_seq_write()`` function based on whether you need formatted output or just
+binary data, respectively. For binary-encoded data, the user space applications
+can process the data from ``bpf_seq_write()`` as needed. For the
formatted data,
+you can use ``cat <path>`` to print the results similar to ``cat
+/proc/net/netlink`` after pinning the BPF iterator to the bpffs mount. Later,
+use ``rm -f <path>`` to remove the pinned iterator.
+
+For example, you can use the following command to create a BPF
iterator from the
+``bpf_iter_ipv6_route.o`` object file and pin it to the
``/sys/fs/bpf/my_route``
+path:
+
+::
+
+ $ bpftool iter pin ./bpf_iter_ipv6_route.o /sys/fs/bpf/my_route
+
+And then print out the results using the following command:
+
+::
+
+ $ cat /sys/fs/bpf/my_route
+
+
+-------------------------------------------------------
+Implement Kernel Support for BPF Iterator Program Types
+-------------------------------------------------------
+
+To implement a BPF iterator in the kernel, the developer must make a one-time
+change to the following key data structure defined in the `bpf.h
+<https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git/tree/include/linux/bpf.h>`_
+file.
+
+::
+
+ struct bpf_iter_reg {
+ const char *target;
+ bpf_iter_attach_target_t attach_target;
+ bpf_iter_detach_target_t detach_target;
+ bpf_iter_show_fdinfo_t show_fdinfo;
+ bpf_iter_fill_link_info_t fill_link_info;
+ bpf_iter_get_func_proto_t get_func_proto;
+ u32 ctx_arg_info_size;
+ u32 feature;
+ struct bpf_ctx_arg_aux ctx_arg_info[BPF_ITER_CTX_ARG_MAX];
+ const struct bpf_iter_seq_info *seq_info;
+ };
+
+After filling the data structure fields, call ``bpf_iter_reg_target()`` to
+register the iterator to the main BPF iterator subsystem.
+
+The following is the breakdown for each field in struct ``bpf_iter_reg``.
+
+.. list-table::
+ :widths: 25 50
+ :header-rows: 1
+
+ * - Fields
+ - Description
+ * - target
+ - Specifies the name of the BPF iterator. For example: ``bpf_map``,
+ ``bpf_map_elem``. The name should be different from other
``bpf_iter`` target names in the kernel.
+ * - attach_target and detach_target
+ - Allows for target specific ``link_create`` action since some targets
+ may need special processing. Called during the user space
link_create stage.
+ * - show_fdinfo and fill_link_info
+ - Called to fill target specific information when user tries to get link
+ info associated with the iterator.
+ * - get_func_proto
+ - Permits a BPF iterator to access BPF helpers specific to the iterator.
+ * - ctx_arg_info_size and ctx_arg_info
+ - Specifies the verifier states for BPF program arguments associated with
+ the bpf iterator.
+ * - feature
+ - Specifies certain action requests in the kernel BPF iterator
+ infrastructure. Currently, only BPF_ITER_RESCHED is supported.
This means
+ that the kernel function cond_resched() is called to avoid other kernel
+ subsystem (e.g., rcu) misbehaving.
+ * - seq_info
+ - Specifies certain action requests in the kernel BPF iterator
+ infrastructure. Currently, only BPF_ITER_RESCHED is supported.
This means
+ that the kernel function cond_resched() is called to avoid other kernel
+ subsystem (e.g., rcu) misbehaving.
+
+
+`Click here
+<https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210212183107.50963-2-songliubraving@fb.com/>`_
+to see an implementation of the ``task_vma`` BPF iterator in the kernel.
+
+---------------------------------
+Parameterizing BPF Task Iterators
+---------------------------------
+
+By default, BPF iterators walk through all the objects of the specified types
+(processes, cgroups, maps, etc.) across the entire system to read relevant
+kernel data. But often, there are cases where we only care about a much smaller
+subset of iterable kernel objects, such as only iterating tasks within a
+specific process. Therefore, BPF iterator programs support filtering
out objects
+from iteration by allowing user space to configure the iterator program when it
+is attached.
+
+--------------------------
+BPF Task Iterator Program
+--------------------------
+
+The following code is a BPF iterator program to print files and task
information
+through the ``seq_file`` of the iterator. It is a standard BPF iterator program
+that visits every file of an iterator. We will use this BPF program in our
+example later.
+
+::
+
+ #include <vmlinux.h>
+ #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+
+ char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+ SEC("iter/task_file")
+ int dump_task_file(struct bpf_iter__task_file *ctx)
+ {
+ struct seq_file *seq = ctx->meta->seq;
+ struct task_struct *task = ctx->task;
+ struct file *file = ctx->file;
+ __u32 fd = ctx->fd;
+ if (task == NULL || file == NULL)
+ return 0;
+ if (ctx->meta->seq_num == 0) {
+ BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, " tgid pid fd file\n");
+ }
+ BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "%8d %8d %8d %lx\n", task->tgid, task->pid, fd,
+ (long)file->f_op);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+----------------------------------------
+Creating a File Iterator with Parameters
+----------------------------------------
+
+Now, let us look at how to create an iterator that includes only files of a
+process.
+
+First, fill the ``bpf_iter_attach_opts`` struct as shown below:
+
+::
+
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_iter_attach_opts, opts);
+ union bpf_iter_link_info linfo;
+ memset(&linfo, 0, sizeof(linfo));
+ linfo.task.pid = getpid();
+ opts.link_info = &linfo;
+ opts.link_info_len = sizeof(linfo);
+
+``linfo.task.pid``, if it is non-zero, directs the kernel to create an iterator
+that only includes opened files for the process with the specified ``pid``. In
+this example, we will only be iterating files for our process. If
+``linfo.task.pid`` is zero, the iterator will visit every opened file of every
+process. Similarly, ``linfo.task.tid`` directs the kernel to create an iterator
+that visits opened files of a specific thread, not a process. In this example,
+``linfo.task.tid`` is different from ``linfo.task.pid`` only if the
thread has a
+separate file descriptor table. In most circumstances, all process
threads share
+a single file descriptor table.
+
+Now, in the userspace program, pass the pointer of struct to the
+``bpf_program__attach_iter()``.
+
+::
+
+ link = bpf_program__attach_iter(prog, &opts); iter_fd =
+ bpf_iter_create(bpf_link__fd(link));
+
+If both *tid* and *pid* are zero, an iterator created from this struct
+``bpf_iter_attach_opts`` will include every opened file of every task in the
+system (in the namespace, actually.) It is the same as passing a NULL as the
+second argument to ``bpf_program__attach_iter()``.
+
+The whole program looks like the following code:
+
+::
+
+ #include <stdio.h>
+ #include <unistd.h>
+ #include <bpf/bpf.h>
+ #include <bpf/libbpf.h>
+ #include "bpf_iter_task_ex.skel.h"
+
+ static int do_read_opts(struct bpf_program *prog, struct
bpf_iter_attach_opts *opts)
+ {
+ struct bpf_link *link;
+ char buf[16] = {};
+ int iter_fd = -1, len;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ link = bpf_program__attach_iter(prog, opts);
+ if (!link) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "bpf_program__attach_iter() fails\n");
+ return -1;
+ }
+ iter_fd = bpf_iter_create(bpf_link__fd(link));
+ if (iter_fd < 0) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "bpf_iter_create() fails\n");
+ ret = -1;
+ goto free_link;
+ }
+ /* not check contents, but ensure read() ends without error */
+ while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, sizeof(buf) - 1)) > 0) {
+ buf[len] = 0;
+ printf("%s", buf);
+ }
+ printf("\n");
+ free_link:
+ if (iter_fd >= 0)
+ close(iter_fd);
+ bpf_link__destroy(link);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ static void test_task_file(void)
+ {
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_iter_attach_opts, opts);
+ struct bpf_iter_task_ex *skel;
+ union bpf_iter_link_info linfo;
+ skel = bpf_iter_task_ex__open_and_load();
+ if (skel == NULL)
+ return;
+ memset(&linfo, 0, sizeof(linfo));
+ linfo.task.pid = getpid();
+ opts.link_info = &linfo;
+ opts.link_info_len = sizeof(linfo);
+ printf("PID %d\n", getpid());
+ do_read_opts(skel->progs.dump_task_file, &opts);
+ bpf_iter_task_ex__destroy(skel);
+ }
+
+ int main(int argc, const char * const * argv)
+ {
+ test_task_file();
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+The following lines are the output of the program.
+::
+
+ PID 1859
+
+ tgid pid fd file
+ 1859 1859 0 ffffffff82270aa0
+ 1859 1859 1 ffffffff82270aa0
+ 1859 1859 2 ffffffff82270aa0
+ 1859 1859 3 ffffffff82272980
+ 1859 1859 4 ffffffff8225e120
+ 1859 1859 5 ffffffff82255120
+ 1859 1859 6 ffffffff82254f00
+ 1859 1859 7 ffffffff82254d80
+ 1859 1859 8 ffffffff8225abe0
+
+------------------
+Without Parameters
+------------------
+
+Let us look at how a BPF iterator without parameters skips files of other
+processes in the system. In this case, the BPF program has to check the pid or
+the tid of tasks, or it will receive every opened file in the system (in the
+current *pid* namespace, actually). So, we usually add a global variable in the
+BPF program to pass a *pid* to the BPF program.
+
+The BPF program would look like the following block.
+
+ ::
+
+ ......
+ int target_pid = 0;
+
+ SEC("iter/task_file")
+ int dump_task_file(struct bpf_iter__task_file *ctx)
+ {
+ ......
+ if (task->tgid != target_pid) /* Check task->pid instead to
check thread IDs */
+ return 0;
+ BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "%8d %8d %8d %lx\n", task->tgid, task->pid, fd,
+ (long)file->f_op);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+The user space program would look like the following block:
+
+ ::
+
+ ......
+ static void test_task_file(void)
+ {
+ ......
+ skel = bpf_iter_task_ex__open_and_load();
+ if (skel == NULL)
+ return;
+ skel->bss->target_pid = getpid(); /* process ID. For
thread id, use gettid() */
+ memset(&linfo, 0, sizeof(linfo));
+ linfo.task.pid = getpid();
+ opts.link_info = &linfo;
+ opts.link_info_len = sizeof(linfo);
+ ......
+ }
+
+``target_pid`` is a global variable in the BPF program. The user space program
+should initialize the variable with a process ID to skip opened files of other
+processes in the BPF program. When you parametrize a BPF iterator, the iterator
+calls the BPF program fewer times which can save significant resources.
+
+---------------------------
+Parametrizing VMA Iterators
+---------------------------
+
+By default, a BPF VMA iterator includes every VMA in every process. However,
+you can still specify a process or a thread to include only its VMAs. Unlike
+files, a thread can not have a separate address space (since Linux
2.6.0-test6).
+Here, using *tid* makes no difference from using *pid*.
+
+----------------------------
+Parametrizing Task Iterators
+----------------------------
+
+A BPF task iterator with *pid* includes all tasks (threads) of a process. The
+BPF program receives these tasks one after another. You can specify a BPF task
+iterator with *tid* parameter to include only the tasks that match the given
+*tid*.
diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/index.rst b/Documentation/bpf/index.rst
index 1bc2c5c58bdb..1a8d372b6faf 100644
--- a/Documentation/bpf/index.rst
+++ b/Documentation/bpf/index.rst
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ that goes into great technical depth about the BPF
Architecture.
maps
bpf_prog_run
classic_vs_extended.rst
+ bpf_iterators
bpf_licensing
test_debug
other
--
2.30.2
--
This song goes out to all the folk that thought Stadia would work:
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/dtaht_the-mushroom-song-activity-6981366665607352320-FXtz
Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread