From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: libreqos <libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
"Bjørn Ivar Teigen" <bjorn@domos.no>
Subject: [LibreQoS] Fwd: Quantifying the quality attenuation of WiFi
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 10:00:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw4SDDe5VTU2PmnohzUeTDhMAHbAsFKEf+Odxyt7Ep4xZQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKf5G6Lr2VHZP9ZWxYZ83zfZzyBHA-XS8MQ+xb=jc9GiYQA+wQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2020 bytes --]
All:
Intro to bjorn, head of research for domos.no in the eu. Attached is a
recent paper of his looking over how wifi works using their analytical
methods.
For the record, the math behind ∆Q makes my head hurt. It has always
made my head hurt. I understand packet loss, FQing and delay, and have
been seeking a good analytical method, in paritcular, for
videconferencing quality, for quite a while. I was happy to see all
the netflix metrics go by the other day...
Also bjorn had sent me a really big document about some broadband
forum work his group is doing, and I don't remember if that was public
or private, he'd asked me to review it
at least, and I spaced on it halfway through, and perhaps it is
published now and he can point us in the right direction. (sorry
bjorn! Terrrrrribly busy here of late)
Domos is positioning itself as a "latency manager" - seemingly
primarily in the eu 5G and Docsis markets, with APIs to "control
stuff" at the kind of layer libreqos works at. We here
are mostly positioned in the WISP and fiber markets, as well as
perhaps other forms of managed networks... tho it would be nice if 5G
in particular was paying more attention!
... and we all are trying to work together to reduce latency on the
internet, and perhaps there will be synergy someday here.
Anyway, an intro to domos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cO-8Q1N9TKU
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Bjørn Ivar Teigen <bjorn@domos.no>
Date: Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 11:06 AM
Subject: Quantifying the quality attenuation of WiFi
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Hi Dave,
I saw your tweets about the p99 conference. This paper of mine about
latency distributions on WiFi was just published at the LCN 2022 and I
thought you might enjoy it!
Cheers,
Bjørn
--
This song goes out to all the folk that thought Stadia would work:
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/dtaht_the-mushroom-song-activity-6981366665607352320-FXtz
Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
[-- Attachment #2: Quantifying_the_Quality_Attenuation_of_WiFi-1.pdf --]
[-- Type: application/pdf, Size: 561711 bytes --]
next parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-28 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAKf5G6Lr2VHZP9ZWxYZ83zfZzyBHA-XS8MQ+xb=jc9GiYQA+wQ@mail.gmail.com>
2022-11-28 18:00 ` Dave Taht [this message]
2022-11-28 18:59 ` [LibreQoS] " Bjørn Ivar Teigen
2022-12-01 16:38 ` Bjørn Ivar Teigen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/libreqos.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAA93jw4SDDe5VTU2PmnohzUeTDhMAHbAsFKEf+Odxyt7Ep4xZQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=bjorn@domos.no \
--cc=libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox