Many ISPs need the kinds of quality shaping cake can do
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: [LibreQoS] routing protocols and daemons
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 13:29:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw5KY4V1_01ZEaavZmkduVqjKGzO4ThZPp9Y4ACjWJ0SDg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

OK, since I'm getting such great updates on the state of the wisp
world, far more in a few days than I've had in 10 years... and btw, no
need to leap on dr science guy research questions like mine if you
have like, towers flooding or the phone ringing off the hook....

What routing protocols are in use nowadays? BGP, yes, and it seems
ospf is popular?

How about ISIS?

I figure babel has zero traction or awareness despite being mandated
by the ietf homenet working group.

Secondly, do you rely on BGP based on the edge router or use it in
software (frr? quagga? bird?). Using RPKI? Push FIBs anywhere? (route
666 in particular)

Similar question related to the IGP protocol in use, where do you rely
on it, vs all the tunnels you have, on what kinds of hardware?

I note that robert at some point, somewhere, pointed out how fq_codel
saved his bacon when there was a major routing mishap (as there is no
congestion control in ospf), and I'd like to hear more of that story.

BATMAN has been mentioned. There's other wireless protocols I've liked
- OLSR for example...

Nobody knows what lies underneath many consumer wireless meshes
although it looks like 802.11s is a starting point, none, so far as I
know interoperate across brands.

-- 
This song goes out to all the folk that thought Stadia would work:
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/dtaht_the-mushroom-song-activity-6981366665607352320-FXtz
Rip Van Winkle COO, TekLibre, LLC

             reply	other threads:[~2022-10-26 20:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-26 20:29 Dave Taht [this message]
2022-10-26 20:53 ` Herbert Wolverson
2022-10-26 21:38   ` Dave Taht
2022-10-26 22:35     ` dan
2022-10-27 13:29       ` Herbert Wolverson
2022-10-27 15:29         ` Mark Steckel
2022-10-27 16:35           ` Dave Taht
2022-10-28 21:47       ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2022-10-28 21:45     ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2022-10-29  0:01       ` Dave Taht
2022-10-29  0:34         ` Dave Taht
2022-10-29  9:15         ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2022-10-29 13:48           ` Herbert Wolverson
2022-10-29 14:13             ` dan
2022-10-29 22:18               ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2022-10-30  0:09                 ` dan
2022-10-30 13:42                   ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2022-10-29 20:11             ` Juliusz Chroboczek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/libreqos.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAA93jw5KY4V1_01ZEaavZmkduVqjKGzO4ThZPp9Y4ACjWJ0SDg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox