From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-x32f.google.com (mail-wm1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 366B83B2A4 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 10:24:25 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-wm1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-412a9457b2eso2522265e9.1 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 07:24:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1708961063; x=1709565863; darn=lists.bufferbloat.net; h=content-transfer-encoding:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=897vhdYzntd39vEQcBHczAAn1zI222uqcdapydp4Qg4=; b=DcwJNwG17G5Dgi0gMYPqIrRewidCRtoJdIep5t2q9l3vyxlsapOue/GBfYR5oj9gIm 8f+eM/+eiujYf9kfuRrO3/I+x8NsY5rWgZ0Fnq1Z+JTTJCA4d9f7dZv8uJwt2b225Rm7 oXgqoaZJ01DQ2MJ7I/+w7YfSZjZq8uAIM5ShWZdHa/Jbo1zl1N1sZ6DJ/NV/zkTDiN3M x2jA9a6FMQsNW1r0PFYJvAMSmLX4+z6nlAP56FrOvZ6u7tejRWRxugLwiDz/NgZ7dNH5 ULdVdffGNbLQvpyFE7cXNWy7EXrW+Gc9T8UVU7HU8DSKcVVVa9dhhrW52HLi7w5WPBjH 9nrw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1708961063; x=1709565863; h=content-transfer-encoding:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=897vhdYzntd39vEQcBHczAAn1zI222uqcdapydp4Qg4=; b=VWUcT7gW/zlIqs1DmEeOWtyn3v49gcwBAMfMqJVoaGrN/YotJ3vib2rfMuH4AcgOVW iCopdA0tklOeqdBY857riYtdygmIEkIE6+wBpdTYtQ5vGZSWICtzNbDJa3bIJIjtAFeb pOXtHx652py+XOVkifeE7FYY8oSn1nf5VL3+ZMoAQ5L0GsnFfUgwER5cBrtnW4EqlSoI 3MJdG7W+g/ItgQevOqmDOmE+pQFEXcADokm6ltFbXxtJwTB42uLy3ghp6uPh/0DFrxZy cgLBm5kclJcZGwcGlL99IYKEdrg5Kvd/OGE24CrkAusi2/jTRBeTE/mq+sTkLb92Odwh rhkw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yys9m7ADAqkuWjgmlgghOg9l+pU4qNYwfdjpIykM6mb346opGUj 4oi0g6aT9Y4WxZ2i/QoVHWhZQQSY2sZLL305KQ7k/giKqTYsd8ZSD9DosRp10UsZx+kms1uUH+k /fR8O8VCVjmWr9JA/PGbI9P41FArRZWGG X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHgrGK4hv3+Baa0qXSvRfSNl7jngIBWFTmopVe3i1q5oA/CGRZzNz5Fz/AZIoMY/vQte2DqZcQ64zBx+8Vyv9A= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1384:b0:412:8844:d067 with SMTP id u4-20020a05600c138400b004128844d067mr6201188wmf.18.1708961063235; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 07:24:23 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Dave Taht Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 10:24:11 -0500 Message-ID: To: libreqos Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [LibreQoS] Fwd: The FCC 2024 Section 706 Report, GN Docket No. 22-270 is out! X-BeenThere: libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Many ISPs need the kinds of quality shaping cake can do List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 15:24:25 -0000 ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Dave Taht Date: Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 10:06=E2=80=AFAM Subject: The FCC 2024 Section 706 Report, GN Docket No. 22-270 is out! To: Network Neutrality is back! Let=C2=B4s make the technical aspects heard this time! , Dave Taht via Starlink , Rpm , discuss , National Broadband Mapping Coalition And... Our bufferbloat.net submittal was cited multiple times! Thank you all for participating in that process! https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-400675A1.pdf It is a long read, and does still start off on the wrong feet (IMHO), in particular not understanding the difference between idle and working latency. It is my hope that by widening awareness of more of the real problems with latency under load to policymakers and other submitters downstream from this new FCC document, and more reading what we had to say, that we will begin to make serious progress towards finally fixing bufferbloat in the USA. I do keep hoping that somewhere along the way in the future, the costs of IPv4 address exhaustion and the IPv6 transition, will also get raised to the national level. [1] We are still collecting signatures for what the bufferbloat project members wrote, and have 1200 bucks in the kitty for further articles and/or publicity. Thoughts appreciated as to where we can go next with shifting the national debate about bandwidth in a better direction! Next up would be trying to get a meeting, and to do an ex-parte filing, I think, and I wish we could do a live demonstration on television about it as good as feynman did here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DraMmRKGkGD4 Our original posting is here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/19ADByjakzQXCj9Re_pUvrb5Qe5OK-QmhlYRLMBY= 4vH4/edit Larry's wonderful post is here: https://circleid.com/posts/20231211-its-the-latency-fcc [1] How can we get more talking about IPv4 and IPv6, too? Will we have to wait another year? https://hackaday.com/2024/02/14/floss-weekly-episode-769-10-more-internet/ -- https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/2024_predictions/ Dave T=C3=A4ht CSO, LibreQos --=20 https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/2024_predictions/ Dave T=C3=A4ht CSO, LibreQos