From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pl1-x635.google.com (mail-pl1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::635]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C39113B29D for ; Sun, 10 Sep 2023 22:35:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x635.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1c09673b006so24516885ad.1 for ; Sun, 10 Sep 2023 19:35:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1694399718; x=1695004518; darn=lists.bufferbloat.net; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=yhuwreS7wpB7OgqORSpMlPpkvMeXsStzx+mFIhDQ9dY=; b=rUqwTM13HtXQi//p1HuaC30F9MCLAxAkllgnVHK6piIpN5X9l+FYDNJReYWq3HoVdb GrLKU8jffPvjP2WUJtAaKMTE40KdERZCfpI1gIaBsPKQUFulEmFY4pdn4u78cV5QQim/ ozayEdPtJ6MwJnt1f5wAHNi12rEPc+rg3i8uj2LsPn38oY7Q6aOJMhTFN7G3FsdY9L58 q1/Lzd7mOaqxjT94agajEgyEsPU/Pl1WFH22UpJuSRHNGXW4RzGNc42tCmj5DteeY/eh Eqpm5995oO3QDjqxGfPkeOgZyZi1YbdtV5Ouzshv07qcO4ydDD5vgPeCTfxILjxgzlPx 2lEg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1694399718; x=1695004518; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=yhuwreS7wpB7OgqORSpMlPpkvMeXsStzx+mFIhDQ9dY=; b=AlYozFHAjQisPPFw1wA/ZEWB7StrcNU9/EoETVw5z5TYT2KgRZXSaocJrZvBfwUUp4 hADi4FjWaSpmajN7KqbBp3f5RiMJDxShieI6qnIp05pYxdC6KO9+8tbPhX4mo3dyYVk7 SN65chD6HeWlFF4ZL2t9GzC6zCODs8o5qjNRlW61ng2FuH/+NuRzGiqQ2Vg5LsHfVda9 GmRZrP6HxiCbehfGWQD7DeVoaYWJgba7lRBE9IjQzqZ54QvKnzD78LLAK7+huU63pXEz +ZszUCq+9nb0qstUtqE3p9Mgd6f9SZjXT9PwwUoX/I0vR9xXP7+hCrRnmqqIG5DcItDc HyWw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzFjBkh+rUkw8N7EbHBbHmKQQk2L2bX5so3HG2QUYdYcYXA98WN P8La7EXbBAY8OKu6pc2vNpgx0YKLrTu1/e3lTj9PFfp/HIg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEI0RW6jMEws+49KYfV/dHLDfPB2vcn2l2h/dqMrEja8H6C0LFHuVphNZFA77KfjJg2DCj5FhZEoJrm5KhxbwM= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b943:b0:1c1:f3f8:3949 with SMTP id h3-20020a170902b94300b001c1f3f83949mr7113560pls.1.1694399718258; Sun, 10 Sep 2023 19:35:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ignacio Ocampo Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2023 20:35:07 -0600 Message-ID: To: libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005080ca06050c2d9c" Subject: [LibreQoS] LibreQoS upstream + Cake/FQ_Codel in CPE Router? X-BeenThere: libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Many ISPs need the kinds of quality shaping cake can do List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 02:35:19 -0000 --0000000000005080ca06050c2d9c Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi all, Is it recommended (or not), to run Cake/FQ_Codel in CPE routers, even if LibreQoS is running upstream? If so, which are the advantages? Also, I'm assuming I will have to set up the router with a lower bandwidth than the assigned by LibreQoS? For instance, if LibreQoS is assigning 13Mbit to the customer, the router (with Cake or FQ_Codel) enabled need to have a limit of ~11Mbit? Please advise. Thanks! -- Ignacio Ocampo --0000000000005080ca06050c2d9c Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all,

Is it recommended (or not), to = run Cake/FQ_Codel in CPE routers, even if LibreQoS is running upstream?

If so, which are the advantages? Also, I'm assumi= ng=C2=A0I will have to set up=C2=A0the router with a lower bandwidth than= =C2=A0the assigned by LibreQoS?

For instance, if L= ibreQoS=C2=A0is assigning 13Mbit to the customer, the router (with Cake or = FQ_Codel) enabled need to have a limit of ~11Mbit?

Please advise. Thanks!

--
Ignacio Oca= mpo

--0000000000005080ca06050c2d9c--