Jeremy,
> On Jul 11, 2023, at 11:09, Jeremy Austin <jeremy@aterlo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 7:01 AM Frank Carmickle via LibreQoS <libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> Dave,
>
> > On Jul 11, 2023, at 10:53, Dave Taht via LibreQoS <libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> >
> > I know everyone here hates paperwork as much or more than I do.
> >
> > ... but me, in particular, would really like to find an ONT that runs fq_codel natively I could recommend.
>
> Have you looked at SFP modules that do PON?
>
> https://www.fs.com/products/141199.html
>
> https://community.fs.com/blog/basic-knowledge-about-gpon-sfp-transceivers.html
>
> Can the the thermal envelope for an SFP truly accommodate traffic shaping? I’m thinking not at the current state of CPU art. Would be delighted to be wrong.
Certainly not. My point was that one could connect an SFP to a system that has a CPU where the shaping could be performed.
--FC
>
> Jeremy
> --
> Jeremy Austin
> Sr. Product Manager
> Preseem | Aterlo Networks
> Book a call: https://app.hubspot.com/meetings/jeremy548
> 1-833-773-7336 ext 718 | 1-907-803-5422
> jeremy@aterlo.com
> www.preseem.com
>
_______________________________________________
LibreQoS mailing list
LibreQoS@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/libreqos
![]() |
Jeremy Austin
Sr. Product Manager Preseem | Aterlo Networks Book a call: https://app.hubspot.com/meetings/jeremy548 |