re: *thoughts and feedback!* your https://test.libreqos.com tests of [Single User Test] & [Virtual Household Mode] both give yours truly bufferbloat grades of *A+ * whereas the https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat test gives yours truly a bufferbloat brade grade of *C* https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat?test-id=b13810f2-e999-4045-8e8b-ab3ab8b957c5 #1.) Why/What's the difference? #2.) Who/Which one to believe¿ g On Sun, Jun 15, 2025 at 4:58 AM Frantisek Borsik via Starlink < starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote: > Hello to all, > > We're excited to announce the release of the *LibreQoS Bufferbloat Test* > – an open-source bufferbloat testing solution designed specifically for > ISPs and network operators to deploy for their customers. > > *Link* > https://test.libreqos.com > > *What Makes This Different* > > While there are several bufferbloat testing tools available, this platform > addresses a critical gap: ISP-deployable infrastructure that provides both > traditional testing and realistic household simulation. > > As Dave Täht highlighted in his influential article "What's Wrong with > Speed Tests" , traditional > speed tests fail to measure what users actually experience. We tried to > address Dave's points to make a better speed test that focuses on the > metric that matters: latency under load in realistic usage scenarios. > > *Two Complementary Test Modes* > > *Single User Test Mode* > > - Traditional sequential load testing (baseline → download → upload → > bidirectional) > - Measures working latency and jitter during each phase > - Familiar A+ to F grading based on latency under load increases > - Comparable to existing tools like DSLReports Speed Test and Waveform > Bufferbloat Test > > > *Virtual Household Mode (The Innovation)* > > Process-isolated simulation of 4 concurrent users with authentic traffic > patterns: > > - Alex (Gaming): 1.5 Mbps constant, jitter-sensitive for competitive > gaming > - Sarah (Video Conference): 2.5 Mbps bidirectional, Teams simulation > with working latency monitoring > - Jake (Netflix HD): 25 Mbps bursts (1s on, 4s off), realistic > streaming patterns > - Computer (Background): Up to 200 Mbps continuous download, system > updates > > > Real-world relevance: Tests latency under load when multiple family > members are online simultaneously > > Advanced grading: Network fairness, jitter measurement, and per-user > working latency analysis > > *Why (not only) ISPs Need This* > > *The traditional approach of sending customers to third-party speed test > sites has limitations:* > > - No control over test methodology or server placement > - Limited correlation with customer support tickets > - Generic results that don't reflect real-world usage patterns > - No integration with ISP operational systems > > *This platform enables (not only) ISPs to:* > > - Host their own testing infrastructure with full control > - Integrate with support systems via telemetry APIs > - Provide customers with realistic household testing scenarios > - Correlate test results with network performance and customer > complaints > > > *Open Source & Community* > > The entire platform is open source and available here: > https://github.com/LibreQoE/bufferbloat_test > > We've designed this to be: > > - Easy to deploy for (not only) ISPs of any size > - Scientifically meaningful in its measurement methodology > - Realistic in its simulation of actual household usage > - Integrable with existing ISP operational workflows > > > > *Community Feedback Requested* > We'd love feedback from the bufferbloat.net community on: > > - Test methodology: Are we measuring the right metrics? > - Grading thresholds: Do our A+ to F grades align with real-world > impact? > - Virtual household scenarios: What other realistic usage patterns > should we simulate? > - ISP adoption: What barriers exist for ISP deployment? > > > > *Technical Discussion* > We'd welcome discussion about: > > - Measurement accuracy for working latency and jitter in virtual > household mode > - Traffic pattern authenticity (gaming, video conferencing, streaming) > - Grading methodology for latency under load in complex multi-user > scenarios > - Integration approaches for ISP operational systems > > > The platform represents our attempt to bridge the gap between academic > bufferbloat research and practical ISP operations, building on the > foundational work of researchers like Dave Täht and the broader bufferbloat > community. We believe that widespread ISP deployment of proper bufferbloat > testing infrastructure will ultimately benefit the entire internet > ecosystem. > > > *Looking forward to the community's thoughts and feedback!* > Best regards, > > The LibreQoS Team > > > *In loving memory of Dave Täht: *1965-2025 > > https://libreqos.io/2025/04/01/in-loving-memory-of-dave/ > > > https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik > > Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp: +421919416714 > > iMessage, mobile: +420775230885 > > Skype: casioa5302ca > > frantisek.borsik@gmail.com > _______________________________________________ > Starlink mailing list > Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink > -- Geoff.Goodfellow@iconia.com living as The Truth is True