Re: [LibreQoS] [Starlink] It’s the Latency, FCC

[Frantisek Borsik <frantisek.borsik@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1396 bytes --]

Thanks for the comments, Jim. I'm adding Sina
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/sinakhanifar/>, CEO at Waveform, to the
conversation. Maybe he will have some answers...

All the best,

Frank

Frantisek (Frank) Borsik



https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik

Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp: +421919416714

iMessage, mobile: +420775230885

Skype: casioa5302ca

frantisek.borsik@gmail.com


On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 5:28 AM Jim Forster <jrforster@mac.com> wrote:

> I kind of like Waveform BB test, but a couple issues:
>
> * From some places in India? and Southern Africa, the closest server they
> use is far away.  Consequently the base latency is much higher than most
> content, which these days comes from CDNs.
>
> * I don’t mind the ads, but I did get a comment from someone I referred to
> it, that the site was ‘mostly about trying to sell some gear’.  WF could
> alleviate that with an explanation of who they are, etc.  Maybe it’s there
> & I missed it?
>
>   — Jim
>
> On Apr 30, 2024, at 6:02 PM, Dave Taht via LibreQoS <
> libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>
> he also had a waveform result as best as I recall. Simpler than running
> flent.
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 2:23 PM Frantisek Borsik <
> frantisek.borsik@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Here are the tests Dave was talking about:
>>
>> [image: image.png]
>>
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4203 bytes --]