Thanks for the comments, Jim. I'm adding Sina, CEO at Waveform, to the conversation. Maybe he will have some answers...

All the best,

Frank

Frantisek (Frank) Borsik

 

https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik

Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp: +421919416714 

iMessage, mobile: +420775230885

Skype: casioa5302ca

frantisek.borsik@gmail.com



On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 5:28 AM Jim Forster <jrforster@mac.com> wrote:
I kind of like Waveform BB test, but a couple issues:

* From some places in India? and Southern Africa, the closest server they use is far away.  Consequently the base latency is much higher than most content, which these days comes from CDNs.

* I don’t mind the ads, but I did get a comment from someone I referred to it, that the site was ‘mostly about trying to sell some gear’.  WF could alleviate that with an explanation of who they are, etc.  Maybe it’s there & I missed it?

  — Jim

On Apr 30, 2024, at 6:02 PM, Dave Taht via LibreQoS <libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:

he also had a waveform result as best as I recall. Simpler than running flent.

On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 2:23 PM Frantisek Borsik <frantisek.borsik@gmail.com> wrote:
Here are the tests Dave was talking about:

image.png