Many ISPs need the kinds of quality shaping cake can do
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luis A. Cornejo" <luis.a.cornejo@gmail.com>
To: "MORTON JR., AL" <acmorton@att.com>
Cc: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>, Jay Moran <jay@tp.org>,
	 Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>,  Rpm <rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	 "dickroy@alum.mit.edu" <dickroy@alum.mit.edu>,
	libreqos <libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [LibreQoS] [Bloat] [Rpm] [Starlink] the grinch meets cloudflare'schristmas present
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 21:47:31 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKJdXWBnq98Sda3dpn38X=uH0oDTm9pSFn89HbOFGuciCRaAfg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKJdXWDOFbzsam2C_24e9DLkc18ed4uhV51hOKVjDipk1Uhc2g@mail.gmail.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1507 bytes --]

Here is my VZ HSI (LTE)

https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat?test-id=eaa13c1c-8cd1-48b2-8527-7a0d35772aba



On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 9:28 PM Luis A. Cornejo <luis.a.cornejo@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Well Reddit has many posts talking about noticeable performance increases
> for Starlink. Here is a primetime run:
>
> waveform:
>
> https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat?test-id=333f97c7-7cbd-406c-8d9a-9f850cb5de7d
>
> cloudflare attached
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 11:43 AM MORTON JR., AL <acmorton@att.com> wrote:
>
>> Dave and Luis,
>>
>> Do you know if any of these tools are using ~random payloads, to defeat
>> compression?
>>
>> UDPST has a CLI option:
>> (m)    -X           Randomize datagram payload (else zeroes)
>>
>> When I used this option testing shipboard satellite access, download was
>> about 115kbps.
>>
>> Al
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
>> > Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2023 11:12 AM
>> > To: Luis A. Cornejo <luis.a.cornejo@gmail.com>
>> > Cc: Jay Moran <jay@tp.org>; Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
>> IETF IPPM
>> > WG <ippm@ietf.org>; MORTON JR., AL <acmorton@att.com>; Rpm
>> > <rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net>; bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
>> > dickroy@alum.mit.edu; libreqos <libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net>
>> > Subject: Re: [Bloat] [Rpm] [Starlink] [LibreQoS] the grinch meets
>> > cloudflare'schristmas present
>> >
>> > Either starlink has vastly improved, or the test is way off in this
>> case.
>>
>

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3178 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Screenshot 2023-01-12 at 21-46-12 Internet Speed Test - Measure Network Performance Cloudflare.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 641624 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-13  3:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-04 17:26 [LibreQoS] the grinch meets cloudflare's christmas present Dave Taht
2023-01-04 19:20 ` [LibreQoS] [Rpm] " jf
2023-01-04 20:02   ` rjmcmahon
2023-01-05 11:11     ` [LibreQoS] [Bloat] " Sebastian Moeller
2023-01-06  0:30       ` [LibreQoS] [Starlink] [Bloat] [Rpm] the grinch meets cloudflare'schristmas present Dick Roy
2023-01-06  2:33         ` rjmcmahon
2023-01-06  9:55         ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-01-05  4:25   ` [LibreQoS] [Starlink] [Rpm] the grinch meets cloudflare's christmas present Dick Roy
2023-01-06 16:38 ` [LibreQoS] " MORTON JR., AL
2023-01-06 20:38   ` [LibreQoS] [Rpm] " rjmcmahon
2023-01-06 20:47     ` rjmcmahon
2023-01-06 23:29     ` [LibreQoS] [Starlink] [Rpm] the grinch meets cloudflare'schristmas present Dick Roy
2023-01-06 23:44       ` rjmcmahon
2023-01-07  0:31         ` Dick Roy
2023-01-10 17:24           ` [LibreQoS] [Bloat] " Luis A. Cornejo
2023-01-11  5:07             ` [LibreQoS] [Rpm] [Bloat] [Starlink] " Dave Taht
2023-01-11 11:05               ` [LibreQoS] [Bloat] [Rpm] " Jay Moran
2023-01-12 16:01                 ` Luis A. Cornejo
2023-01-12 16:12                   ` Dave Taht
2023-01-12 16:20                     ` Luis A. Cornejo
2023-01-12 17:42                     ` MORTON JR., AL
2023-01-13  3:28                       ` Luis A. Cornejo
2023-01-13  3:47                         ` Luis A. Cornejo [this message]
2023-01-13  4:01                         ` Dave Taht
2023-01-13 14:08                           ` Luis A. Cornejo
2023-01-13  3:30                       ` Luis A. Cornejo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/libreqos.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAKJdXWBnq98Sda3dpn38X=uH0oDTm9pSFn89HbOFGuciCRaAfg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=luis.a.cornejo@gmail.com \
    --cc=acmorton@att.com \
    --cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=dickroy@alum.mit.edu \
    --cc=ippm@ietf.org \
    --cc=jay@tp.org \
    --cc=libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox