From: "MORTON JR., AL" <acmorton@att.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>,
bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
libreqos <libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
Dave Taht via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
Rpm <rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net>, "IETF IPPM WG" <ippm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [LibreQoS] the grinch meets cloudflare's christmas present
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2023 16:38:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CH0PR02MB79809552F1D5CEDB832A8590D3FB9@CH0PR02MB7980.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw4sbPeZ42eTLQzPmg_-viBBtbdQogAMgMNndoEHjY5UNA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2347 bytes --]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: LibreQoS <libreqos-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net> On Behalf Of Dave Taht
> via LibreQoS
> Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2023 12:26 PM
> Subject: [LibreQoS] the grinch meets cloudflare's christmas present
>
> Please try the new, the shiny, the really wonderful test here:
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://speed.cloudflare.com/__;!!BhdT!iZcFJ8WVU9S<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/speed.cloudflare.com/__;!!BhdT!iZcFJ8WVU9S9zz5t456oxkfObrC5Xb9j5AG8UO3DqD5x4GAJkawZr0iGwEUtF0_09U8mCDnAkrJ9QEMHGbCMKVw$>
> 9zz5t456oxkfObrC5Xb9j5AG8UO3DqD5x4GAJkawZr0iGwEUtF0_09U8mCDnAkrJ9QEMHGbCMKVw$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/speed.cloudflare.com/__;!!BhdT!iZcFJ8WVU9S9zz5t456oxkfObrC5Xb9j5AG8UO3DqD5x4GAJkawZr0iGwEUtF0_09U8mCDnAkrJ9QEMHGbCMKVw$>
>
> I would really appreciate some independent verification of
> measurements using this tool. In my brief experiments it appears - as
> all the commercial tools to date - to dramatically understate the
> bufferbloat, on my LTE, (and my starlink terminal is out being
> hacked^H^H^H^H^H^Hworked on, so I can't measure that)
[acm]
Hi Dave, I made some time to test "cloudflare's christmas present" yesterday.
I'm on DOCSIS 3.1 service with 1Gbps Down. The Upstream has a "turbo" mode with 40-50Mbps for the first ~3 sec, then steady-state about 23Mbps.
When I saw the ~620Mbps Downstream measurement, I was ready to complain that even the IP-Layer Capacity was grossly underestimated. In addition, the Latency measurements seem very low (as you asserted), although the cloud server was “nearby”.
However, I found that Ookla and the ISP-provided measurement were also reporting ~600Mbps! So the cloudflare Downstream capacity (or throughput?) measurement was consistent with others. Our UDPST server was unreachable, otherwise I would have added that measurement, too.
The Upstream measurement graph seems to illustrate the “turbo” mode, with the dip after attaining 44.5Mbps.
UDPST saturates the uplink and we measure the full 250ms of the Upstream buffer. Cloudflare’s latency measurements don’t even come close.
Al
[Screen Shot 2023-01-05 at 5.54.26 PM.png][Screen Shot 2023-01-05 at 5.54.53 PM.png][Screen Shot 2023-01-05 at 5.55.39 PM.png]
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 42872 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: image001.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 176230 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #3: image002.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 461849 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #4: image003.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 225012 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-06 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-04 17:26 Dave Taht
2023-01-04 19:20 ` [LibreQoS] [Rpm] " jf
2023-01-04 20:02 ` rjmcmahon
2023-01-05 11:11 ` [LibreQoS] [Bloat] " Sebastian Moeller
2023-01-06 0:30 ` [LibreQoS] [Starlink] [Bloat] [Rpm] the grinch meets cloudflare'schristmas present Dick Roy
2023-01-06 2:33 ` rjmcmahon
2023-01-06 9:55 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-01-05 4:25 ` [LibreQoS] [Starlink] [Rpm] the grinch meets cloudflare's christmas present Dick Roy
2023-01-06 16:38 ` MORTON JR., AL [this message]
2023-01-06 20:38 ` [LibreQoS] " rjmcmahon
2023-01-06 20:47 ` rjmcmahon
2023-01-06 23:29 ` [LibreQoS] [Starlink] [Rpm] the grinch meets cloudflare'schristmas present Dick Roy
2023-01-06 23:44 ` rjmcmahon
2023-01-07 0:31 ` Dick Roy
2023-01-10 17:24 ` [LibreQoS] [Bloat] " Luis A. Cornejo
2023-01-11 5:07 ` [LibreQoS] [Rpm] [Bloat] [Starlink] " Dave Taht
2023-01-11 11:05 ` [LibreQoS] [Bloat] [Rpm] " Jay Moran
2023-01-12 16:01 ` Luis A. Cornejo
2023-01-12 16:12 ` Dave Taht
2023-01-12 16:20 ` Luis A. Cornejo
2023-01-12 17:42 ` MORTON JR., AL
2023-01-13 3:28 ` Luis A. Cornejo
2023-01-13 3:47 ` Luis A. Cornejo
2023-01-13 4:01 ` Dave Taht
2023-01-13 14:08 ` Luis A. Cornejo
2023-01-13 3:30 ` Luis A. Cornejo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/libreqos.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CH0PR02MB79809552F1D5CEDB832A8590D3FB9@CH0PR02MB7980.namprd02.prod.outlook.com \
--to=acmorton@att.com \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=ippm@ietf.org \
--cc=libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox