Many ISPs need the kinds of quality shaping cake can do
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [LibreQoS] FCC NOI due dec 1 on broadband speed standards
@ 2023-11-11 16:32 Dave Taht
  2023-11-11 18:24 ` [LibreQoS] [NNagain] " rjmcmahon
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dave Taht @ 2023-11-11 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical
	aspects heard this time!
  Cc: libreqos

https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-23-89A1.pdf

Obviously I am going to have to weigh in on section 26, at least. I
would rather be writing code...

-- 
:( My old R&D campus is up for sale: https://tinyurl.com/yurtlab
Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [LibreQoS] [NNagain] FCC NOI due dec 1 on broadband speed standards
  2023-11-11 16:32 [LibreQoS] FCC NOI due dec 1 on broadband speed standards Dave Taht
@ 2023-11-11 18:24 ` rjmcmahon
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: rjmcmahon @ 2023-11-11 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical
	aspects heard this time!
  Cc: Dave Taht, libreqos

Thanks for this. It helps a lot.

I think a unified voice from this group around the metrics could be 
quite good. I do want to make sure iperf 2 covers this in a simple 
manner and very well so we in the chip business can catch issues very 
early in the process life cycle:

Regardless of the benchmark that we select for fixed broadband service, 
we believe it is
valuable for fixed providers to report on a wide range of download 
speeds and, in addition, multiple
upload speeds for each download speed. We invite commenters to suggest 
what they consider relevant
combinations of benchmark download and upload speeds that we should 
report for both fixed and mobile
broadband service. As part of their suggestions, we request that 
commenters consider the availability of
reliable and comprehensive data and suggest available sources.

Bob

> https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-23-89A1.pdf
> 
> Obviously I am going to have to weigh in on section 26, at least. I
> would rather be writing code...

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-11-11 18:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-11-11 16:32 [LibreQoS] FCC NOI due dec 1 on broadband speed standards Dave Taht
2023-11-11 18:24 ` [LibreQoS] [NNagain] " rjmcmahon

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox