From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-x233.google.com (mail-it0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5813A3B29F for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 09:39:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-it0-x233.google.com with SMTP id k64so25629739itb.0 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 06:39:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:references:to:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2TTsKh9/wxCVyM9Fx3asn8q6aVcnIZiGPhiV4hnwhc4=; b=xEaNlYTBZPWyrNKNgFUNl5i3sJGwpIyr6Se6gmd1rZJ9XGlI9YyR7jpBFDrQpeE/Tc NJxpjSpzleLjUw0EcgPwv3sNBTvt13VWEPqroKoKDECxtXUBaTILn2n8muHZq+CG7B1l nZ5nQkmViUfWcM/oEx2pg7Mr6RdsftCoTkMSs+oSd3ACRosrBrdOYFOWog7nJNFX513l mCCVsSKSJ6UsouA4R/hwhVWu7zAfl503KKCfNfTLWP2uQJjcFWgYG6Cq/yUTrNHNna1L TYo+tOyfVDPAhdL5t7LvwLoAwKcz7NbOACXj20LqmQ4g2URQsxHz35Q/lPbIojzgXsqe aQUw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:references:to:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2TTsKh9/wxCVyM9Fx3asn8q6aVcnIZiGPhiV4hnwhc4=; b=l+Oh1krgmt8JB5TkHcKHFeeUL4N5HYMH1yK4RDnUz7bAJilZjTtQ/96tItQq1ByZ5Y fCOWjlQ4KUDI0t83B1P/1yClt0aaFQj2euy4wVckFjjlRLGTuOOEUrF7SuEHKv0Ju4Ch z2Xb/iSOLKQX2Q2bnLppJdkZKcxkvcyszNzPB8avkWwA5orpiTKq3XT49D2Ksv6D8pug mJVyDryIpCcx2nZxILlU3juB+tawk6TwNqLhz1kBDdHPEHAFZ3IzE3uspLUfNla5c2M6 YGV4ITpXyw5tATRCcMhjZXXbBf0UBCxFiDSxjx6HFQhmKTJg0+ZyKFrJIIbPp1fNnEJs jBng== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9Rk+gxoUcruf/L3xdzH4Rvw2/tjKocMJAQBakC4YKcoZuXdpCevtU0d2KVR+V9AJ/Q== X-Received: by 10.36.122.212 with SMTP id a203mr1481532itc.25.1476279550563; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 06:39:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.21.63.50] (hades.kettering.edu. [192.138.137.97]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v5sm3574705iod.33.2016.10.12.06.39.09 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 12 Oct 2016 06:39:10 -0700 (PDT) References: To: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net From: Noah Causin Message-ID: <02a3f65a-75bc-a973-0bd7-0b8b02b7bd18@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 09:39:20 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Point to Point AC with FQ_Codel X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 13:39:11 -0000 Thank you for your advice. I am considering the Ubiquiti PBE-5AC-500 PowerBeam 5ghz AC Units. If I run into issues with bufferbloat, I can bridge two ethernet ports on a router and apply Cake shaping passively. Also: I didn't understand what you meant by "The DSPs are better." On 10/12/2016 9:09 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > But the header of your message had "AC" in it... and at this point, I > think going AC is good, regardless of the state of the drivers - you > should be able to get 260mbits or more, fairly easily out of that, and > so long as you can't saturate it, get pretty low latency, and we do > have fq_codel (if not airtime fairness) patches for the ath10k. The > DSPs are better.