From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-x22d.google.com (mail-it0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9836E3B25D for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:03:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-it0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id i184so17223611itf.1 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 09:03:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=pm4PYyU97s49zIBaiIS4bkYa9Ks4kvK5k6WEyRpSBSg=; b=hgUW60BErSH7ofCrlqwGKfwDhyhb5PDuwhpfmGflgQN/gnGziyjYKGFH2OufTDrEMa 6HfFNAR05P/ypJnsT2hXIyoegKRimV9ua1qlXuDfr4wx5zwVgb6Opr0mc4s5lpBJ6o7/ Wmhb5j/vMEF9bevbVGVw0cjLxDJ5JzX8DKYcfKXXr65u0Qm5m+FKh/xD7SQawRpqKlOZ haIOgSw9J8rwCFPMtS1qhplh8TGSBj1cl0MCPF7UtD+3C5UX3p55ZhZeR47SuPeWu5bM EwKRrhU6tTd80O63uX+shdiTESV4cE6QFR9yr733XBMIvDe9C1/F951MkQ5aQYqGG8eO J0tw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pm4PYyU97s49zIBaiIS4bkYa9Ks4kvK5k6WEyRpSBSg=; b=PSFw0bzQcewwQ3/RZ2ozfHcQWUWe2D/UiJKCJ407TTV8DlJkiQk7JCaUyi1M1gQKIB +HrKO5bFAnDY5xRzLJOvBXnb1yXs938vek1qjq1l/WQFMvpSpFvJ/7UeTNABo0Uoa6yw I/nOaU0Xoq8PL8W3hEZnlx/0tA8ZW+T0+AI60jB32/iMK7Nl6Zw+C2JkZFhx6Z2/gVXg l+WcKmJHFD26DhSfZrYRRNw5cOG499L3VcG7ctjkGxqQjqIdEARvubi8s4MsVpvZBsnQ jowoLe3mdoO6fVdMb3MQWymx3iN0mn3/cWpq/A37nL7MZwagccurroBwDkZZZ2rwFWxE Qsew== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPAoEErn/I4uyFWownwvcu5jyXJq70AZCmzd47CLnr8tF53tf34pS6VM2yMi1EPnQ== X-Received: by 10.36.46.136 with SMTP id i130mr13296860ita.62.1472659428890; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 09:03:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.10.75] ([207.73.177.229]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j63sm5559296itj.19.2016.08.31.09.03.48 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 31 Aug 2016 09:03:48 -0700 (PDT) To: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net From: Noah Causin Message-ID: <10316004-e147-a646-5e1f-5ceb4abf580c@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:03:51 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Make-wifi-fast] Disabling WMM But Keeping Wireless-N Speeds X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 16:03:49 -0000 Hi, I was reading through my LEDE Wireless Page and noticed that my wireless bitrate was 54.0 Mbit/s. I started reading and found out that WMM is required to get the higher rates of Wireless N. I read here that WMM causes problems with both flow starvation and latency. http://blog.cerowrt.org/post/cs5_lockout/ Is there a way to keep the higher speeds of Wireless N, but not gain the issues from WMM? Thank you, Noah Causin