From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp110.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (smtp110.iad3a.emailsrvr.com [173.203.187.110]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4AB43B2AB for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 18:16:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtp14.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp14.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 94F6028033A; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 18:16:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from app13.wa-webapps.iad3a (relay-webapps.rsapps.net [172.27.255.140]) by smtp14.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 89D5F2802E4; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 18:16:40 -0400 (EDT) X-Sender-Id: dpreed@reed.com Received: from app13.wa-webapps.iad3a (relay-webapps.rsapps.net [172.27.255.140]) by 0.0.0.0:25 (trex/5.5.4); Wed, 30 Mar 2016 18:16:40 -0400 Received: from reed.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by app13.wa-webapps.iad3a (Postfix) with ESMTP id 747AB20046; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 18:16:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: by apps.rackspace.com (Authenticated sender: dpreed@reed.com, from: dpreed@reed.com) with HTTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 18:16:40 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 18:16:40 -0400 (EDT) From: dpreed@reed.com To: "Dave Taht" Cc: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net, "Andrew McGregor" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Type: plain In-Reply-To: References: X-Auth-ID: dpreed@reed.com Message-ID: <1459376200.475225876@apps.rackspace.com> X-Mailer: webmail/12.3.2-RC Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] =?utf-8?q?thoughts_on_rate_control_optimizations?= =?utf-8?q?_for_less_than_perfection=3F?= X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 22:16:41 -0000 Nice piece. But I would be relentless about simplifying mechanisms and not= having lots of options to achieve the same goal. That way lies non-interop= erability (just as ECN ended up being pretty non-interoperable in a world w= here everyone gets to choose a different way to try to use it)=0A=0A=0A=0AO= n Tuesday, March 29, 2016 3:48pm, "Dave Taht" said:= =0A=0A> I wish I could remember where the selective unprotect idea came fro= m....=0A> =0A> see: http://blog.cerowrt.org/post/selective_unprotect/=0A> _= ______________________________________________=0A> Make-wifi-fast mailing l= ist=0A> Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net=0A> https://lists.bufferbloat.= net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast=0A> =0A