From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [5.9.151.49])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81DAD3B25D
 for <make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
 Thu,  1 Sep 2016 04:34:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa
 (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87)
 (envelope-from <johannes@sipsolutions.net>)
 id 1bfNS3-0001xx-BE; Thu, 01 Sep 2016 10:34:23 +0200
Message-ID: <1472718860.4249.0.camel@sipsolutions.net>
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Toke =?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>
Cc: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 10:34:20 +0200
In-Reply-To: <87inug81vo.fsf@toke.dk>
References: <20160824162015.29933-1-toke@toke.dk>
 <20160830131548.6014-1-toke@toke.dk>
 <1472677599.5470.13.camel@sipsolutions.net> <87inug81vo.fsf@toke.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.4-1+b1 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] [PATCH v4] mac80211: Move reorder-sensitive TX
 handlers to after TXQ dequeue.
X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: <make-wifi-fast.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/make-wifi-fast>,
 <mailto:make-wifi-fast-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/make-wifi-fast>
List-Post: <mailto:make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:make-wifi-fast-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast>,
 <mailto:make-wifi-fast-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 08:34:24 -0000


> > > +static int invoke_tx_handlers(struct ieee80211_tx_data *tx)
> > > +{
> > > +	return invoke_tx_handlers_early(tx) ||
> > > invoke_tx_handlers_late(tx);
> > > +}
> > 
> > Ugh, please, no, don't be tricky where it's not necessary. Now
> > every
> > person reading this has to first look up the return type, and then
> > the
> > return value, and make sure they understand that success is
> > actually
> > the value 0 ... that's way too much to ask.
> 
> Noted. Any objections to turning these into bool return types?

They have three possible values ... :)

johannes