From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-x22a.google.com (mail-pf0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D9433B2D0 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 15:34:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pf0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id p64so33656604pfb.1 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 12:34:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=paD+88rWEumYEc3COn0blffmg0WwjE/06FqDdU92chA=; b=qqFBfvMg5FKCVtGkzk5+gB03gydLguuv6TYXlNPWPGrUrvdEyvKddFOdkwqApbqE+E iJH7JcJZ+xYZfZQk7w+N9goL6D5SOWt5c7NRhc6bpf9MtMQuzbFrOX3HnbKdOK5CRptI fK54L/m80ySKTsWP5xzwa57nVc1386B1AJx8b+y9x6WLMeQhB3oByL/CFnNWnp09J8PH IMLII3Hd3+0T6i0aH8je/sQLvE5J4a40ahtr7DU4yy7fiszl9Y1tcSqZZGmFzyuRMkxA vCqTd1uvEJetWdna6AOYSKi4X3/lNT2/VDOTaNd0nRwQZx3VzuWa5JrfysSdfZ1CTrZ9 NNBA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=paD+88rWEumYEc3COn0blffmg0WwjE/06FqDdU92chA=; b=BJoCj0Etuu78UDUHMlEgbkcfn7pKYSNYXhCHnW2IuoTVEJ0vV42v61otl9tvyr3sCd gZr7m5bRPL7r0Ag4d1wbs3Pl10QlzCg22Rqd0oJozDC1vhSyBG1OPysRQ2Kil859sJxl TtM1x4bdqFdPgAal9kANTHOGDi6MSEMZkZkJkVNUT85gSxlcdFDyEVu5+VlTViE341R0 fEkA9zDbL2aNDeVBgbjJSuWziyNurgR1ojwd0PhLlMUuRWgc9ZrrY7uaRkgCnWgCY5H/ 1/gE3Bf2CddMydwE+pYBRLPwXz1RfbvbIICkfpbbclGGqHk0UQdrJh+LUlvU+3dQWyrZ W4Dw== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNR4kO/jSuOmdvxU8eT8F56A8J63eIrSZ44X6ApJizGD/xHygoJN3YgOr7E6xowiQ== X-Received: by 10.98.135.136 with SMTP id i130mr5992729pfe.145.1474572880315; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 12:34:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2620:0:1000:1704:8c90:f090:2618:e18d? ([2620:0:1000:1704:8c90:f090:2618:e18d]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id x66sm5874662pfb.86.2016.09.22.12.34.39 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 22 Sep 2016 12:34:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1474572879.28155.2.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> From: Eric Dumazet To: Dave Taht Cc: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net, Eric Dumazet Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 12:34:39 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] possible TSQ patch for better aggregation X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 19:34:41 -0000 On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 12:29 -0700, Dave Taht wrote: > Eric strikes again, with a TSQ improvement that might account for some > of the issues we've encountered with testing single tcps against wifi > clients: > > https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg129509.html > > I've got a pic showing the issue somewhere - basically flows to the > routers did poorer aggregation than flows through the router, even > with only minimal cpu in use. > > thx eric! > You are very welcome, although I am not sure the patch actually changes something in the case you described ? Unless you run your TCP flows from the router itself ?