From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp94.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (smtp94.iad3a.emailsrvr.com [173.203.187.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C66E03CB3A for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 11:06:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtp36.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp36.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 99B31543C; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 11:06:36 -0400 (EDT) X-SMTPDoctor-Processed: csmtpprox beta Received: from smtp36.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp36.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 962C2521E; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 11:06:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from app56.wa-webapps.iad3a (relay-webapps.rsapps.net [172.27.255.140]) by smtp36.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 86A42543C; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 11:06:36 -0400 (EDT) X-Sender-Id: MAILER-DAEMON Received: from app56.wa-webapps.iad3a (relay-webapps.rsapps.net [172.27.255.140]) by 0.0.0.0:25 (trex/5.7.12); Tue, 16 Oct 2018 11:06:36 -0400 Received: from deepplum.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by app56.wa-webapps.iad3a (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E5ABA0488; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 11:06:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: by apps.rackspace.com (Authenticated sender: dpreed@deepplum.com, from: dpreed@deepplum.com) with HTTP; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 11:06:36 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 11:06:36 -0400 (EDT) From: "David P. Reed" To: "Dave Taht" Cc: "Make-Wifi-fast" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <1539702396.449625040@apps.rackspace.com> X-Mailer: mobile/6.0.2 Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] I wonder if UWB is legal in space... X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 15:06:36 -0000 There is no system of rules in space beyond LEO. Space is currently not a jurisdiction of law of its own. Nor is there a reg= ulatory authority. And a good thing, too. The ETs would be prosecuting all transmitters on Ear= th for violating their regulations... Unlike Earth where Marconi's 1901 Syntonic Multiplexing patent got turned i= nto laws that makes UWB multiplexing illegal everywhere, the ETs are probab= ly not all so ignorant as the US Supreme Court. The US Supreme Court decide= d in several cases that because Coase said there are a finite number of fre= quencies, which means there should be exclusive ownership of frequencies. All an ignorant derivative of a (brilliant) hack solution by Marconi for Mo= rse Code Wireless in 1901. There are no frequencies in Maxwell's Equations. Period. That was known in = 1865. -----Original Message----- From: "Dave Taht" Sent: Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 6:18 pm To: dpreed@deepplum.com, "Make-Wifi-fast" Cc: "Make-Wifi-fast" Subject: I wonder if UWB is legal in space... https://www.google.com/search?client=3Dubuntu&channel=3Dfs&q=3Dspacex+wirel= ess+mac+engineer&ie=3Dutf-8&oe=3Dutf-8&ibp=3Dhtl;jobs#fpstate=3Dtldetail&ht= idocid=3D9r0KSkG17rfbN-mOAAAAAA%3D%3D&htivrt=3Djobs --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht CTO, TekLibre, LLC http://www.teklibre.com Tel: 1-831-205-9740