Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Status of the industry on over buffering at the WiFi air interface

["David P. Reed" <dpreed@deepplum.com>]

I know this is hard to measure, in general. Especially to isolate the issue because it combines packet scheduling, the AP's own activity, and the insertion of excess buffering in each device's hardware and driver software. 

However, what I'm looking for is evidence that helps locate the problem, which of course is a "distributed scheduling and buffering" problem, unlike the simple bufferbloat we all saw in the CMTS's of DOCSIS 2.0,, ALU's LTE deployments in the early days of 4G (at ATT Wireless), or the overbuffering in Arista Networks's switches, which were quite simple to measure and diagnose.

On Wednesday, February 12, 2020 7:36pm, "Bob McMahon" <bob.mcmahon@broadcom.com> said:

> hmm, not sure if this helps but "excess queueing" can be hard to define.
> 
> Do you know the operating systems for the WiFi devices and if tooling can
> be loaded upon them?  iperf clients samples RTT and CWND for linux
> machines. Iperf 2.0.14 (in development) has a lot of latency related
> features
> 
> Also, if there is control over the AIFS one can set that for the high rates
> devices such that they always win and the lower rate ones always lose.  If
> that solves things it does suggest WiFi tx queues developing per the TXOP
> arbitration and air transmission as an issue.  Standard cwmin/cwmax isn't
> as effective though it won't allow high rates to starve low rates devices
> as AIFS might (depending upon the values)
> 
> I use latency to measure the performance and define bounds that way and
> it's very specific to use cases.  IT does require clock sync. My devices
> have GPS disciplined oscillators which aren't common.
> 
> As an aside, the HULL approach of phantom queues looks interesting.
> https://people.csail.mit.edu/alizadeh/papers/hull-nsdi12.pdf
> 
> Bob
> 
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 4:08 PM David P. Reed <dpreed@deepplum.com> wrote:
> 
>> A friend of mine (not a network expert, but a gadget freak), has been
>> deploying wireless security cameras at his home and vacation home. He uses
>> a single WiFi AP in each place, serving the security cameras etc.
>>
>> What he observes is this:
>>
>> Whenever anyone on a laptop in one of the homes uploads a modest sized
>> file (over the same WiFi) the security systems all lose data.
>>
>> Now I can't go to his home to diagnose this, but I've asked him to check
>> out his cable bufferbloat using dslreports, and he gets no bufferbloat
>> there. But it sure looks like *severe* lag under load is affecting the
>> security camera feed to the cloud servers that the company that sells the
>> security cameras provides.
>>
>> So, is there a way to simply *diagnose* the WiFi air link for excess
>> queueing in all the high rate WiFi devices? Something a non-net-head could
>> do?
>>
>> The situation around congestion control in the industry continues to
>> royally suck, in my opinion. The vendors don't care, the ISPs don't care
>> (they can sell a higher speed connection than is actually needed and
>> super-fabulous MIMO gadgets that still don't quite solve the problem).
>>
>> I'm an old guy, basically retired. I'm sad because the young folks remain
>> clueless.
>>
>> And it's been decades since bufferbloat was discuvered, and the basic
>> issue of congestion signalling being needed. I'm sure 5G (whatever it
>> really is) is not paying attention to this network level congestion issue...
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Make-wifi-fast mailing list
>> Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast
>