From: Pete Heist <peteheist@gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave@taht.net>
Cc: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Flent test hardware
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 02:37:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <186C017F-CAF4-4ED7-A3C3-A3B1B8A0A1BD@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87o9oe2a8p.fsf@nemesis.taht.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1337 bytes --]
> On Nov 7, 2017, at 1:39 AM, Dave Taht <dave@taht.net> wrote:
>
> I was away from keyboard for much of this thread, I wanted to point out
> that I find the pcengines apu2 series very useful as routers and
> testbeds. They are way easier to open up than the nucs, have 3 intel
> ethernet ports, AND 2-3 mini-pcie ports, and can be had, with memory for
> under 200 bucks.
>
> That said, the nucs are often convienent because they have video chips.
Well _that’s_ interesting, I actually already have 2x APU (not APU2) from FreeNet (my ISP) for testing. FreeNet uses these as routers.
But, the APUs I have are V1 and have a dual core with Realtek 8111E, where the APU2 has a quad core with Intel i210/211AT. The APU2 looks far preferable for testing, and I hadn’t noticed its existence. It’s dramatically cheaper than anything else I was looking at, and since I don’t need video, if the CPUs are fast enough, they look very interesting as a way to save a lot of money.
So I added those as a build:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1MVxGsreiGKNXhfkMIheNFrH_GVllFfiH9RU5ws5l_aY/edit#gid=199471438 <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1MVxGsreiGKNXhfkMIheNFrH_GVllFfiH9RU5ws5l_aY/edit#gid=199471438>
Basically I could get two of those for one of most anything I was looking at. Thanks for that idea!
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2041 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-07 1:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-04 13:33 Pete Heist
2017-11-04 15:06 ` Sebastian Moeller
2017-11-04 16:33 ` Pete Heist
2017-11-04 17:25 ` Sebastian Moeller
2017-11-04 18:45 ` Pete Heist
2017-11-05 1:42 ` Bob McMahon
2017-11-05 12:13 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-11-05 14:23 ` Pete Heist
[not found] ` <CAJq5cE0nkn+iDP9NuU2aoSk_G+2cxkZYShj9PfK5u=Fr7fTrLA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAJq5cE13M=fmyh2oQ5UxFCOcoPhZ2nOPEkqRWcT-UdGT60=ezA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAJq5cE1KQ+K9x7k+bnuFvqyNhjsg6mSn_CU4b0h8S1bwo5SXOg@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAJq5cE2Tk_TAHES+7O28MjryG-nYHRNJ5OB9WjsCXGSfEgORog@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAJq5cE0xkhbXYZ4c1+-9FmKOv1_DFFMJh8hqa-W8jEx+K_xTFg@mail.gmail.com>
2017-11-05 16:24 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-11-05 17:39 ` Pete Heist
2017-11-05 18:08 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-11-05 18:42 ` Pete Heist
2017-11-05 20:15 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-11-07 0:32 ` Pete Heist
2017-11-05 13:57 ` Pete Heist
2017-11-05 19:42 ` Bob McMahon
2017-11-05 21:41 ` Pete Heist
2017-11-06 20:15 ` Isaac Konikoff
2017-11-06 21:29 ` Bob McMahon
2017-11-07 0:39 ` Dave Taht
2017-11-07 1:37 ` Pete Heist [this message]
2017-11-07 10:21 ` Pete Heist
2017-11-08 4:46 ` Bob McMahon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/make-wifi-fast.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=186C017F-CAF4-4ED7-A3C3-A3B1B8A0A1BD@gmail.com \
--to=peteheist@gmail.com \
--cc=dave@taht.net \
--cc=make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox