From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk1-x729.google.com (mail-qk1-x729.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::729]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49FC43CB36 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 10:59:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-qk1-x729.google.com with SMTP id 4so8018032qki.6 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 07:59:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:message-id:date :to; bh=uFNV/t3XDUeuKzuOx3qyoYsysCUou06cSLMalht3+94=; b=I4FHQGdcY7uCV4w+SpMUgBrtmCOCxPEQYumhPwv9gs2k0qkIcgsadKskI86sHYRkEu /ORbE16KZCiZJs9nefEmVM7Vk73cJ+A+MnwevE+LPH9Sr57PnHTIm6EORicArotp1c38 wmZaxcswg9JjXXlXO3oRkWxHEaE+Tw+NxWLZPsI/6m6GKqNZEwiZEqf9uPT4/YGDPMoR KNhh4xtnpTrnrmrke7y9z4JoPG+2zKJUq+rninz/h0kKZHqpkylzAvyRo5m/0EmSQj5I 08C7ccpVQx6Mw9yOeNGXUFFlFYYRGzyeVqooKJBd+a5s/kJrC2H7s6qVGLtpYgY57s0l D9Ig== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:message-id:date:to; bh=uFNV/t3XDUeuKzuOx3qyoYsysCUou06cSLMalht3+94=; b=V64C1u4ALLZ7vsqBVGjMvzttzHSzw8mlp7KzZ2wmwUxA7CUf22TXO3XAuHVsfqwXFz T2U3U737zcwhF4lOo/o5HIBe73vK2HZT06Q9Py/DNAIvxJ4/uNkC0wdP855jtLaZ1Ove zf1JgkJO8070wLXhmDr6N3eKTFwa6R4uaQwXlig0pJTzdUKC8bJLCyZxIXGp8xSxYaCK WPWcZ+5rmSuHK92LPf6naCyJG13SxLWY4HJWhcGMUfmtJZ2insoZuE1Tt2pN56c+n+G2 0mrtd/8XQ7PtzLHgIMADdNyetKG1K9qa3YFgX46R/j15IYyT+UmgKNovhOH8pJmApUyb i+NQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVWD/1fc8YlD3a17+cOiVdy8Iun59s9CoI275q+ZItlqWm3+hsx zVgJkFg6rMdNCjqbmpKI168joD4J57U= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxdcf7q9sA7uocaJAVquz51PBLLC4iha0m7q8pwwyMN2HqYx3t0AHvcQLB/hYSFK1GDhl6vyA== X-Received: by 2002:a37:515:: with SMTP id 21mr360951qkf.87.1569855552668; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 07:59:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from richs-mbp-10337.lan ([64.223.232.103]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c12sm5646161qkc.81.2019.09.30.07.59.11 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 30 Sep 2019 07:59:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Rich Brown Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Message-Id: <1C8CA44A-31E8-4EF0-B685-5534CF2F64BE@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 10:59:11 -0400 To: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) Subject: [Make-wifi-fast] Best practice: multiple SSIDs on a radio...? X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 14:59:13 -0000 Sorry for this somewhat OT question, but I know that I'm tapping into a = mother lode of Wi-Fi knowledge... A local coffee shop wants a guest and a private network, supported by = separate SSIDs. Is there a benefit (or would it be bad) to put the = public network on one channel and the other network/SSID on another = channel? (And is the answer the same for their 2.4GHz and 5GHz radios?) Many = thanks. Rich