From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Cc: Valent Turkovic <valent@otvorenamreza.org>,
"cerowrt-devel\@lists.bufferbloat.net"
<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] [Cerowrt-devel] routers you can throw off the back of a truck
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 11:14:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <23342.1453133686@dooku.sandelman.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6737994D-CE0B-46F5-B55C-A584FF6A8014@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 684 bytes --]
Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> wrote:
> I haven’t yet found a robust way to automatically sense link capacity from
> the upstream side. You’ll therefore need to set a conservative static
> value for the uplink capacity.
As the maintainer of a PPPoE concentrator, and operator of some networks,
I've been considering whether one can estimate the bandwidth using round
trip PPP IPCP keep alives. Clearly, if both ends participate in time
stamping then it is much better, but I've been wondering if we can do some
incremental deployment on one side or the other.
Sadly, I mostly just think about this while cycling; I haven't written any
code yet.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 489 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-18 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-17 18:46 [Make-wifi-fast] " Dave Taht
2016-01-17 20:32 ` [Make-wifi-fast] [Cerowrt-devel] " Outback Dingo
[not found] ` <CAGOios74tbFyHaKHDYhTatBUX0_Xt+My0UZ3OqaMbTcN6Yy_GA@mail.gmail.com>
2016-01-18 8:30 ` Jonathan Morton
[not found] ` <CAGOios4VMSHV5r8OrFvKn+JJG84YBk7sSg-TL=YPij1mXz+tMg@mail.gmail.com>
2016-01-18 10:51 ` Alan Jenkins
2016-01-18 11:29 ` Jonathan Morton
[not found] ` <CAGOios4JvvHjNkiCRt0f4DPb2em71+pkV2kd8hD-BHk_SE8+nQ@mail.gmail.com>
2016-01-18 23:01 ` Jonathan Morton
[not found] ` <CAGOios6-S=mJfdLkwNS2JCqWx_jNApy3sLsDofXgAfXWLSd-4A@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAGOios6EKmbX29zBOcJZG7P3Gd=bGr2XBjWJwoF0Y=Q=WPFK7Q@mail.gmail.com>
2016-01-21 23:40 ` Valent Turkovic
2016-01-22 6:37 ` Jonathan Morton
2016-01-22 7:11 ` moeller0
2016-03-13 11:17 ` Valent Turkovic
2016-01-18 16:14 ` Michael Richardson [this message]
2016-01-18 23:06 ` Jonathan Morton
2016-01-19 1:06 ` Michael Richardson
2016-01-22 7:23 ` moeller0
2016-01-22 7:05 ` moeller0
2016-01-18 20:26 ` Dave Taht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/make-wifi-fast.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=23342.1453133686@dooku.sandelman.ca \
--to=mcr@sandelman.ca \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=chromatix99@gmail.com \
--cc=make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=valent@otvorenamreza.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox