From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-x242.google.com (mail-io0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 060773B2A3 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 11:37:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-io0-x242.google.com with SMTP id y195so3701140iod.0 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 08:37:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mSUg5ghD2H8XAIukVj+vRFfAc6gxFKxtxYnJQ9d/Jb4=; b=dn49t/KUA3Bw5GCTVLWVxse/G675JJwXtshrR6IG6cmVGN/Hl1CHE5tcyHA+Ml01wP IqnJamaBevJlW3mjnUQTOWJep94Sman7MZ4PYpcQz/4Wpk7flvoWIVXCp2xFwfrHjcND zY9YQhOqUnZc+ECIfJIb2p8ug2K8WP3Lv3dL3U2BNypfuTjZ1/TM0xsle93TxYHJWnjO pQJGY57NpEr4r2GMA1afCfI1q6gl7DK7vabIE3oougWdDlPyCaWQ1RPCb4Tu5MIWFZum 7KLgEePNV98Et/Ec5If/DViirOhjzhpk0QP4yz/GX/AXla9haiht3CeOE7LF76qb2AFN cdmA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mSUg5ghD2H8XAIukVj+vRFfAc6gxFKxtxYnJQ9d/Jb4=; b=VCrjN/B3jCrjzawBis+5Ml1RpRCqeTN5xeP1AAcE4eoYaGjv5wuGZwy4APXqoRv729 NX+AXi+lGKX3W85lz6+RnXLcMF6mlAZy8sHzF4JuOfdk1oiLyQNrSAmw+56BlJ549vZ2 1S7kq6wVa30cgHV141+W0ftRAtttqOg9K+3HF7CJ2E19K93zZx5WuKMKslTDucBw9k4I FdngQa+EValrvkNM/FXsUwwiuh2ICKVh4K9Te7fdx32HibBQmCH+TuIvJiPef/DOAwMD 3hJdWcyoAgbeby1yUdNHMNtINa4m2viDy5P+vxxjCHXkxNw6FdLWKVIL3hRRku5iuY+F LOeQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKBlYlaEr9sqAxaDHPpod9zM/GB0py005t4okS9ib5QVB4r72QgFBaCLKtlEmIHIA== X-Received: by 10.107.140.205 with SMTP id o196mr50079324iod.42.1469029045515; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 08:37:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.10.0.3] (c-68-42-142-136.hsd1.mi.comcast.net. [68.42.142.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h67sm1614617ioe.40.2016.07.20.08.37.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 20 Jul 2016 08:37:25 -0700 (PDT) To: Michal Kazior , =?UTF-8?Q?Toke_H=c3=b8iland-J=c3=b8rgensen?= References: <87y44wo3hg.fsf@toke.dk> Cc: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net From: Noah Causin Message-ID: <2ecd6df0-7495-34fe-07c6-f50698ccbc94@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 11:37:28 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Does mac80211 use fq_codel X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 15:37:26 -0000 Thank you both for the information. I was wondering. Would this commit for LEDE disable the fq portion of fq_codel in mac80211? https://github.com/lede-project/source/commit/4952469ff9278288d766b28247a17694b1c4faaa On 7/20/2016 9:30 AM, Michal Kazior wrote: > On 20 July 2016 at 15:15, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: >> N0man Tech writes: >> >>> I was wondering if mac80211 currently uses fq_codel in LEDE using >>> intermediate software queues. >> Depends on your driver: If you're using ath10k it does (I think). If > If you have a very recent patch (I think nbd's staging tree contains > it) ath10k will not support it unless you have a firmware capable of > peer-flow-control (not sure if it's publicly available yet). Not even > sure what FW is used in LEDE/OpenWRT now. > > >> you're using ath9k, there's a patch in nbd's staging tree. No other >> drivers use the intermediate queues that I'm aware of. > There's mt76 but I'm not sure if it's available in OpenWRT/LEDE (and > if so on which branch/repo). > > > Michał