Lets make wifi fast again!
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pete Heist <peteheist@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Cc: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Flent test hardware
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2017 18:39:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D513EEE-348B-4770-9D65-3C5F1320540C@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJq5cE3fdDqKY30k6irPXFEu0KEMSg+WzD=7TDA12_zq86y5ug@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2126 bytes --]


> On Nov 5, 2017, at 5:24 PM, Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> wrote:
> If budget is a primary concern, there are a number of boards available with the AM1 socket which is designed around low-power, low-cost APUs, or even with an APU soldered to them.  AMD are phasing that platform out right now, but it's still available since there isn't a direct replacement at the same price yet.
> 
> What you'll get here are the small "cat series" cores designed for netbooks and game consoles, but a quad-core version remains pretty cheap.  My E-450 is an older, dual-core version of this and is capable enough, like a slightly gimped C2D.
> 
> However, I haven't yet found one with anything other than a bog standard Realtek NIC.  They do have PCIe slots, so you can add a discrete card.
> 
From this info I spec’d out two builds and compared it with the Proliant Microserver: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1MVxGsreiGKNXhfkMIheNFrH_GVllFfiH9RU5ws5l_aY/edit#gid=199471438 <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1MVxGsreiGKNXhfkMIheNFrH_GVllFfiH9RU5ws5l_aY/edit#gid=199471438>

You’re right, the toughest part with low-end hardware is finding high quality and/or dual-port NICs, which is what seems to make the Proliant a pretty good deal. Most hardware in this range has Realteks, which might be ok, but I’m not convinced, so I added a dual port Intel PRO/1000 to each of my two builds, which then makes their price a bit higher than the Proliant.

One advantage to the external PRO/1000 is that it supports PCIe x4 whereas the BCM5720 that comes with the Proliant only supports PCIe x2, so there’s a bit of a difference here, which I may or may not notice. On the other hand, the BCM5720 supports hardware timestamping whereas the Intel does not.

I guess I should focus on the big picture here, either quad-core is important vs dual-core or it isn’t, and either I can do my testing with one box for both client and server or I need two. Neither I’m entirely sure about, so I might end up ordering something with the option to return so I can run some tests.

Thanks again for the tips...

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2791 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-05 17:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-04 13:33 Pete Heist
2017-11-04 15:06 ` Sebastian Moeller
2017-11-04 16:33   ` Pete Heist
2017-11-04 17:25     ` Sebastian Moeller
2017-11-04 18:45       ` Pete Heist
2017-11-05  1:42 ` Bob McMahon
2017-11-05 12:13   ` Jonathan Morton
2017-11-05 14:23     ` Pete Heist
     [not found]       ` <CAJq5cE0nkn+iDP9NuU2aoSk_G+2cxkZYShj9PfK5u=Fr7fTrLA@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]         ` <CAJq5cE13M=fmyh2oQ5UxFCOcoPhZ2nOPEkqRWcT-UdGT60=ezA@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]           ` <CAJq5cE1KQ+K9x7k+bnuFvqyNhjsg6mSn_CU4b0h8S1bwo5SXOg@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]             ` <CAJq5cE2Tk_TAHES+7O28MjryG-nYHRNJ5OB9WjsCXGSfEgORog@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]               ` <CAJq5cE0xkhbXYZ4c1+-9FmKOv1_DFFMJh8hqa-W8jEx+K_xTFg@mail.gmail.com>
2017-11-05 16:24                 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-11-05 17:39                   ` Pete Heist [this message]
2017-11-05 18:08                     ` Jonathan Morton
2017-11-05 18:42                       ` Pete Heist
2017-11-05 20:15                         ` Jonathan Morton
2017-11-07  0:32                           ` Pete Heist
2017-11-05 13:57   ` Pete Heist
2017-11-05 19:42     ` Bob McMahon
2017-11-05 21:41       ` Pete Heist
2017-11-06 20:15     ` Isaac Konikoff
2017-11-06 21:29       ` Bob McMahon
2017-11-07  0:39 ` Dave Taht
2017-11-07  1:37   ` Pete Heist
2017-11-07 10:21     ` Pete Heist
2017-11-08  4:46       ` Bob McMahon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/make-wifi-fast.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3D513EEE-348B-4770-9D65-3C5F1320540C@gmail.com \
    --to=peteheist@gmail.com \
    --cc=chromatix99@gmail.com \
    --cc=make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox