From: Pete Heist <peteheist@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Cc: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Flent test hardware
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2017 18:39:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D513EEE-348B-4770-9D65-3C5F1320540C@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJq5cE3fdDqKY30k6irPXFEu0KEMSg+WzD=7TDA12_zq86y5ug@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2126 bytes --]
> On Nov 5, 2017, at 5:24 PM, Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> wrote:
> If budget is a primary concern, there are a number of boards available with the AM1 socket which is designed around low-power, low-cost APUs, or even with an APU soldered to them. AMD are phasing that platform out right now, but it's still available since there isn't a direct replacement at the same price yet.
>
> What you'll get here are the small "cat series" cores designed for netbooks and game consoles, but a quad-core version remains pretty cheap. My E-450 is an older, dual-core version of this and is capable enough, like a slightly gimped C2D.
>
> However, I haven't yet found one with anything other than a bog standard Realtek NIC. They do have PCIe slots, so you can add a discrete card.
>
From this info I spec’d out two builds and compared it with the Proliant Microserver: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1MVxGsreiGKNXhfkMIheNFrH_GVllFfiH9RU5ws5l_aY/edit#gid=199471438 <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1MVxGsreiGKNXhfkMIheNFrH_GVllFfiH9RU5ws5l_aY/edit#gid=199471438>
You’re right, the toughest part with low-end hardware is finding high quality and/or dual-port NICs, which is what seems to make the Proliant a pretty good deal. Most hardware in this range has Realteks, which might be ok, but I’m not convinced, so I added a dual port Intel PRO/1000 to each of my two builds, which then makes their price a bit higher than the Proliant.
One advantage to the external PRO/1000 is that it supports PCIe x4 whereas the BCM5720 that comes with the Proliant only supports PCIe x2, so there’s a bit of a difference here, which I may or may not notice. On the other hand, the BCM5720 supports hardware timestamping whereas the Intel does not.
I guess I should focus on the big picture here, either quad-core is important vs dual-core or it isn’t, and either I can do my testing with one box for both client and server or I need two. Neither I’m entirely sure about, so I might end up ordering something with the option to return so I can run some tests.
Thanks again for the tips...
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2791 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-05 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-04 13:33 Pete Heist
2017-11-04 15:06 ` Sebastian Moeller
2017-11-04 16:33 ` Pete Heist
2017-11-04 17:25 ` Sebastian Moeller
2017-11-04 18:45 ` Pete Heist
2017-11-05 1:42 ` Bob McMahon
2017-11-05 12:13 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-11-05 14:23 ` Pete Heist
[not found] ` <CAJq5cE0nkn+iDP9NuU2aoSk_G+2cxkZYShj9PfK5u=Fr7fTrLA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAJq5cE13M=fmyh2oQ5UxFCOcoPhZ2nOPEkqRWcT-UdGT60=ezA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAJq5cE1KQ+K9x7k+bnuFvqyNhjsg6mSn_CU4b0h8S1bwo5SXOg@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAJq5cE2Tk_TAHES+7O28MjryG-nYHRNJ5OB9WjsCXGSfEgORog@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAJq5cE0xkhbXYZ4c1+-9FmKOv1_DFFMJh8hqa-W8jEx+K_xTFg@mail.gmail.com>
2017-11-05 16:24 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-11-05 17:39 ` Pete Heist [this message]
2017-11-05 18:08 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-11-05 18:42 ` Pete Heist
2017-11-05 20:15 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-11-07 0:32 ` Pete Heist
2017-11-05 13:57 ` Pete Heist
2017-11-05 19:42 ` Bob McMahon
2017-11-05 21:41 ` Pete Heist
2017-11-06 20:15 ` Isaac Konikoff
2017-11-06 21:29 ` Bob McMahon
2017-11-07 0:39 ` Dave Taht
2017-11-07 1:37 ` Pete Heist
2017-11-07 10:21 ` Pete Heist
2017-11-08 4:46 ` Bob McMahon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/make-wifi-fast.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D513EEE-348B-4770-9D65-3C5F1320540C@gmail.com \
--to=peteheist@gmail.com \
--cc=chromatix99@gmail.com \
--cc=make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox