From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-x230.google.com (mail-it0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2369E3B260 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 18:59:35 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-it0-x230.google.com with SMTP id y23so4241660itc.0 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 15:59:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pis1tAgo3YnSY339iU/1WIndV3ZtmcV57Xolx5qbKKI=; b=KOdSjsBAtJe/hyeTx0HLR1YVA+HiRHlfcoI7cGxASV5THHfiYqBcrIxtijR0bXqCHA 60dbfuYhEC4sIOp32AxuoYsOnEownfiSbIy+czeYIiBavDIJhavdgVThHC0U2SINqOrk Ct+UiWhVJQWwaRjnwS/BicOibQVIQGVAAp/27Gny4MtVJj/GGDyxc4VdkyYsl67+dfU5 OIIh/56TSqcMaFyAvTkh1mtvAzHVcK7OdCs3ADUgzYbiVfZ1ASXqI2XVJeRqsGmEBDXE MhbhXjYTKsE0u2a0CqMathhWFOBxxLzCSkYR1yXWdYLZM1BQFtyAqak+bWQpogrhSfCZ MQmw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pis1tAgo3YnSY339iU/1WIndV3ZtmcV57Xolx5qbKKI=; b=bQdxezFHxRCgFn8w8VwsvUMDOYjeGLf+7HUR23kkcL9c9JzZgIrDx8D9vq9J31wMJA g7vM5kk2MVsfej9Duk1dImrQAUpxcbEFsqfjATuF7UYIN9eWbDQWHelNjqWduG+r9qPN BFBhPNIiWTlxw2kuwvCpwwzCYwb/ihV8mF6u+oIPX0JSZOFYCJN618RLgTpxZRKoOZox RCwkgQ4h/A7CMlUWErmsVjak9Zx7souXYZmv2gONccRIixkVqb135xdAfrI1R9Tdclc0 i+ju8e3Orws2d42lG45Lm4JJNou2YIICpwMS/djcPx80oaBe7fJ0llpTUHO2hw104WH8 hysA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00PZKUFi5BCncTOsg4z+K7c2nMUvCRWc0AzdBABWlPmAEkQfXFmOq3U136nbieX/g== X-Received: by 10.107.187.132 with SMTP id l126mr791361iof.118.1479340774696; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 15:59:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.0.5] (c-68-42-142-136.hsd1.mi.comcast.net. [68.42.142.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b81sm314803iob.31.2016.11.16.15.59.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 16 Nov 2016 15:59:34 -0800 (PST) To: Michal Kazior References: <69119644-7618-0f4a-884a-e01fb1a7edb6@gmail.com> Cc: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net From: Noah Causin Message-ID: <6b753f5d-1764-335d-8eac-75a957cc7ed2@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 18:59:33 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Experimental ath10k airtime fairness patch? X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 23:59:35 -0000 Thank you for the patch. On 11/15/2016 1:36 PM, Michal Kazior wrote: > On 14 November 2016 at 18:06, Noah Causin wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I was wondering if there is an experimental airtime fairness patch for the >> ath10k on LEDE. >> >> I have been using Toke's patch for enabling intermediate queue support on >> the ath10k, and it has been working well. > I did some work on that but didn't finish nor publish it. > > I just dug around my git repo and found something. I can't remember if > it was this exactly what I used in the "100 station" thingy[1][2] or > not. Attached. > > Feel free to play around it if you want. It should provide fairness > but will degrade peak performance due to delayed firmware aggregation > introducing extra idling latency and the naive design. > > You'll most likely need to rebase it. > > [1]: http://imgur.com/a/sSn8V > [2]: http://www.linuxplumbersconf.com/2016/ocw//system/presentations/3963/original/linuxplumbers_wifi_latency-3Nov.pdf > page 28, 30 > > > Michał