From: Erkki Lintunen <ebirdie@iki.fi>
To: Make-Wifi-fast <make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: [Make-wifi-fast] tweak tx-power to make wifi sta prefer 5G
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 14:55:02 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6c76b99b-873a-6a6c-86f4-0b49f09eea1f@iki.fi> (raw)
Antoine Beaupre blogged: <https://anarc.at/blog/2022-04-13-wifi-tuning/>
> After listening to an episode of the 2.5 admins podcast, I realized
> there was some sort of low-hanging fruit I could pick to better tune
> my WiFi at home.
One gets my attention, though, a fading thought, could there be any left?
> So I was surprised to hear one of the podcast host say "it's all
> about airtime" and "you want to reduce the power on your access
> points" (APs). It seemed like sound advice: better bandwidth means
> less time on air, means less collisions, less latency, and less
> power also means less collisions. Worth a try, right?
Right. Have heard that before. Old news coming, perhaps?
> 2. Power
...
> On 5GHz, power was about 20dBm (100 mW) -- and more on the Turris! --
> when I first looked, so I tried to lower it drastically to 5dBm
> (3mW)just for kicks. That didn't work so well, so I bumped it back up
> to 14 dBm (25 mW) and that seems to work well: clients hit about
> -80dBm when they get far enough from the AP, which gets close to the
> noise floor (and where the neighbor APs are), which is exactly what I
> want.
> On 2.4GHz, I lowered it down even further, to 10 dBm (10mW) since it's
> better at going through wells, I figured it would need less power. And
> anyways, I rather people use the 5GHz APs, so maybe that will act as an
> encouragement to switch. I was still able to connect correctly to the
> APs at that power as well.
What?! Why haven't I come to think about that before... Chasing my way
to the knobs of my AP.
Both 2.4GHz ja 5GHz radios were already set to 10dBm, not left to auto.
All associated stations were listing on the 2.4GHz radio. Moved 5GHz
radio power to 14dBm just to see, how it affects the list. Immediately
most associated stations moved to the 5GHz radio. There are couple
only-2.4 sta's in my wifi network, those ought to not move, I think.
Thank you Antoine! Very nice. Me thought, wifi-dog old enough not to
learn new tricks. And so simple not to need 802.11r, .11k... .11v.
Veeery nice, indeed.
May this little effective tweak discovery give joy to some other as well.
Best regards,
Erkki
reply other threads:[~2022-04-14 11:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/make-wifi-fast.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6c76b99b-873a-6a6c-86f4-0b49f09eea1f@iki.fi \
--to=ebirdie@iki.fi \
--cc=make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox