From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from c118g-smal-w1.jetrails.io (c118g-smal-w1.jetrails.io [69.27.32.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 918A33B2A4 for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 09:31:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [71.219.21.137] (port=50187 helo=[10.168.3.101]) by c118g-smal-w1.jetrails.io with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1lee63-0005ma-Ua; Thu, 06 May 2021 08:31:20 -0500 Cc: tim@timhiggins.com To: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net References: From: Tim Higgins Message-ID: <7222df84-7fb9-bfed-5c70-ad10c1b43634@timhiggins.com> Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 09:31:20 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 210506-4, 05/06/2021), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - c118g-smal-w1.jetrails.io X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.bufferbloat.net X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - timhiggins.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: c118g-smal-w1.jetrails.io: authenticated_id: tim@timhiggins.com X-Authenticated-Sender: c118g-smal-w1.jetrails.io: tim@timhiggins.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Enabling Massive Real-Time Applications in IEEE 802.11be Networks X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 13:31:20 -0000 I have not seen the promised improvements in any of the experiments I've done. I suspect you need a LOT of STAs to see a difference, at least that's what I take away from this QCA paper. https://www.qualcomm.com/media/documents/files/the-benefits-of-ofdma-for-wi-fi-6-a-technology-brief-highlighting-qualcomm-technologies-competitive-advantage.pdf On 5/6/2021 4:15 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > Has anyone seen OFDMA work yet in the real world? If so, this paper > seemed promising. > > https://sci-hub.se/10.1109/PIMRC.2019.8904271