From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [52.28.52.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FD4E3BA8E for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2017 07:33:24 -0400 (EDT) From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1507030402; bh=vFnyOMKzLqyrRFLgDabtHg9RiGYqnLSZ7yt7HVHjnoU=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=wtd7g2hS9pOaUstx7yD/REMkKByGKt9RlK2cRGHn2samxjnE+0SYhKx20IhgMkk0G Fr5/OalEk5RVzHkLrxkBpTzSEd7CErXIUeXaqLPUXrGm3clNHNuX0/GUhKyGvUcD/k X0Bd3Zf0T0KNqTfgcY3ag+VzrUCFWUNj/dG6TCO3zjs22guBAnL0xCsBi3qZDsdNC9 d1xBKAQB/MOsBNhYhl4b4soAuOdv8cvKLjYtwj9sMquwFCBMlwS/75wFDtwr0TYBgF ACmPnftRPxzRc9oUpFlSXFF9hsPaeYRDzgnS1XDw4msqYGxiXFLrzImvuk1SpM/nRk 6MO1PrYg5BEuQ== To: Jon Pike , make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 13:33:20 +0200 X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <873770tqin.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Make-wifi-fast Digest, Vol 29, Issue 11 X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 11:33:25 -0000 Jon Pike writes: > Now I'm wondering if the missing latency performance will reappear... > ;-) > > Actually, wanted to ask again exactly what kind of functionality the patch > enables. I'd like to pass an accurate impression along to the custom C7 > build group on LEDE Forum, which would get it a lot of test experience. > https://forum.lede-project.org/t/gcc-6-3-build-optimized-tp-link-archer-c7-v2-ac1750-lede-firmware/1382 > > Just by chance, the last official build was a day before Toke put up the > patch. There are nightly builds, which I assume would have it included now, > but I imagine the majority just use the official. > If I'm going to tell people about this, I want to be on target with what it > will do for them. Well, it'll enable the bufferbloat mitigation patches for ath10k on the C7. Which should hopefully result in lower latency while the WiFi is saturated. However, I don't have any specific benchmarks to point to... -Toke