From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [77.235.48.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E32A3B260 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 14:42:18 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail2.tohojo.dk DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 mail2.tohojo.dk 90ECE40D5E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=201310; t=1472496136; bh=Ou3nFrtz8kS2RA35uB9fBQR+/pbphhi+i+ru/7y1tlw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=hZVAkkGoexzd1VEqHS/2hUDIKqPdebboTnY9VBPOEG6zguhqhcoX2jf+HmEk9vxtx bUlk8thME8UlwY3OtMHU4prJ93quMeFYHZWNK8qs7N7CRFXD7ixXiwygdGpL6Jzazb oCeY6P0ydGukyJ+MIi2FAYykgKV4ExM46lQ6z0KE= Sender: toke@toke.dk Received: by alrua-karlstad.karlstad.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5A12D8257EA; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 20:42:15 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: Richard Smith Cc: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net References: <9c57d85b-99a0-8dbd-a32e-6af9f5c95787@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 20:42:15 +0200 In-Reply-To: <9c57d85b-99a0-8dbd-a32e-6af9f5c95787@gmail.com> (Richard Smith's message of "Mon, 29 Aug 2016 14:14:45 -0400") X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <874m63ju2g.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Testing the LEDE nbd/staging branch X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 18:42:18 -0000 Richard Smith writes: > I noticed a need-more-testing post on the CeroWrt list and finally got > around to building a nbd/staging+airtime fariness wndr3700v2 image for > one of my spare units. > > I just subscribed to the list and looks like there are some followup > patches not in my build so I'll have to re-test with the followups > next. > > One question: Are these patches "Just Work" or do I need to do some > tweaking of qdiscs, etc like the sqm or cake stuff needs? If so what > are those? They are "just work", but there are some issues that I am currently trying to work out. If you just run off Felix' staging tree you are fine, but won't get per-flow FQ to each station. You can remove package/kernel/mac80211/patches/220-fq_disable_hack.patch which will get you the per-station FQ, but will break crypto. Should be fine for testing unencrypted stuff though. -Toke