From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [77.235.48.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66F963B29F for ; Sat, 1 Oct 2016 14:09:50 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail2.tohojo.dk DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 mail2.tohojo.dk 5786841622 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=201310; t=1475345387; bh=rPgUmj+6HPQ6HjiDpVF9UBcRHQkM67Yn/iBREsJUOfU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=D52ylFsBANdzr9y/oRwcuxAE3qlGq/LPxKVwMjBQM7f+sRfVMwS5oZf4/5hfnnBJs Y0mVFv1Bdn5TBY71Ddjd+NHPD36spr+DAJpPXKk7rHdott4NDy8xKtweWcELjwmMUi OWEgtjTO7fl2WQoR91Qcw/Fgj3Cskop6xTl1UVjw= Received: by alrua-karlstad.karlstad.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 624FA874511; Sat, 1 Oct 2016 20:09:47 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: Dave Taht Cc: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net References: Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2016 20:09:47 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Dave Taht's message of "Fri, 30 Sep 2016 11:38:35 -0700") X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <8760pc9c0k.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] net-next is next X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2016 18:09:50 -0000 Dave Taht writes: > I'm a little vague on the pieces missing as yet. I think?, still out > of tree are: Don't see anything missing from the list that I have been working on. Of the things I have: > * Hooking up the ath9k to the intermediate queues code I expect Kalle to add this sometime during the upcoming merge window (which opens tomorrow, according to the PHB crystal ball: http://phb-crystal-ball.org/). > * airtime fairness for the ath9k Haven't submitted a new version of this since the other things went in. While the basic scheduler works well, there are still some things to work out before making a serious attempt at upstreaming it (most notably the interaction with the hardware QoS queues). Also, moving parts of the code into mac80211 would make it easier to re-use in other drivers. Not sure which parts, though. > * Codel "hack" for low rates This still needs to be solved, but the hack I posted previously was just that: A hack. I think a different approach is needed. > As for what's in lede.... ? LEDE has the previous version of the mac80211 fix and the ath9k patch to enable the TXQ. -Toke