From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [52.28.52.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AE233B29E for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 13:50:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1528912244; bh=/GXl5/rqFK+hIL/II+NZs3F3t+G24uZ97MRjtIv8zOM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=BAdUr1k4LeQFM56YJruADKm3hME154IXYUJ6bo57dHXd7P7yhgKP3LyAQTX2YaYfr w+hruw8qNLy6jYA1CsReYoaLRRHnmZ8GsePGj1Hg/mMY2BTB84ZOQKLTf6dBJkW8BG QK5vvABFj9cPyMFeV3a5z2aS9+we0bXuIjNWcRArW1hBy4NTVCT/yF9l47LUNVY5so 6Cvh6SOTT0sYpE5jiq0t8UNkeMHlVg2IBiN58R0Lr2yLLzKFhRqbCTJ0PfpJgp0Y9R v5vqeaJH5Rtz2qxUTR1W/P5LrNMtcmcvFQOpJpsJj9wrLIqWvB1n+rEJwN4aqzCJOg yVbz94ddgkWeQ== To: Sebastian Moeller Cc: Pete Heist , bkil , make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net In-Reply-To: <764A7AE3-8F89-4387-AC97-1C347A8982AC@gmx.de> References: <9E7E043B-2373-46ED-B122-38A287422999@eventide.io> <87d0wu7rbg.fsf@toke.dk> <764A7AE3-8F89-4387-AC97-1C347A8982AC@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 19:50:44 +0200 X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <877en27eyz.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] mesh deployment with ath9k driver changes X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 17:50:46 -0000 Sebastian Moeller writes: > Ho Toke, > >> On Jun 13, 2018, at 15:24, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen wrote: >>=20 >> Pete Heist writes: >>=20 >>> Trying one thing at a time, as legacy_rates=3D=E2=80=981=E2=80=99 didn= =E2=80=99t do anything >>> noticeable, which is not surprising when we probably don=E2=80=99t have= many >>> =E2=80=98b' devices connecting. We hit 4.9s ping times this morning, go= od >>> work. :) >>>=20 >>> Even though isolation couldn=E2=80=99t be turned on in the admin interf= ace >>> (because it says it can=E2=80=99t do it when bridging to a VLAN, for so= me >>> reason), I was able to enable isolation for both SSIDs and it still >>> seems to work, so that=E2=80=99s the change as of now: >>>=20 >>> wireless.ap0_1.isolate=3D'1' >>> wireless.ap0_2.isolate=3D=E2=80=981=E2=80=99 >>>=20 >>> Before I could ping between clients, and now I can=E2=80=99t, so appare= ntly >>> isolation is doing what it should. The next test will be tonight. >>>=20 >>> I=E2=80=99m still waiting for the digging / cabling project to happen, = which >>> is what I expect to bring the biggest benefit. Again, that will add a >>> new cabled AP which will serve as a gateway for cabin 12 and split >>> cabins 12 and 20. This should also improve the signal to 12 vastly, >>> which is one of the most loaded APs and currently only has RSSI -71 / >>> MCS 5 or 6 to its parent AP, now that the leaves are full on the >>> trees. >>=20 >> How to improve WiFi? Run cables! :D > > Just consider this to be a cheap* way to create a favorable RF > environment for the signals ;) Oh, I am well aware of this: https://blog.tohojo.dk/2017/11/building-a-wireless-testbed-with-wires.html -Toke