From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [52.28.52.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C7DB3B2A0 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 04:57:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.toke.dk (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.toke.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A075E10D6E3; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 10:57:34 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1478771854; bh=sR7fr7O5YyJbRXxMxnGysr3x5wrYp3zJ+4oOjebzMPU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=PSVBvtQQGBqJO4OTcaT1r1U0GBmaFx8ZxJQgewPm5TRYH724/wleMLOxNPdS1rnDz tDp+KFUeocKCoYa/uZoatFT//oLy+fqR2CmgT7ycAfWjJKycjbAqkKv2BQf8AJLv3k YmiIg0g695txbVmKfacBnsgA5wJtYvZzbkgd4RURBInV8jtjirUc9gOhTMUs7DZxJf CCA+YqVBQvFeTiXjyPc80LpWhiBnDU1YnHzMYM/08SRS/jwznjALUtzQEOUoB8fRej AS4+ydtwomPlJn2eI59JtVuPEc2Sma8JEhnkwFDAfd5YnnSjwE+f14XyJbv754vo6f AtMFTW3+UOpWg== Received: by alrua-x1.borgediget.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8A98CF5EA; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 10:57:33 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant Cc: References: <682ee5c6-2228-7019-f724-ec1c6aeabdaa@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 10:57:33 +0100 In-Reply-To: <682ee5c6-2228-7019-f724-ec1c6aeabdaa@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> (Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant's message of "Thu, 10 Nov 2016 09:31:35 +0000") X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <87bmxnzmgi.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] airtime fairness patches LEDE X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 09:57:36 -0000 Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant writes: > Hi Toke, > > What state are the ath9k airtime fairness patches in your tree? > > I tried pulling them into a local build branch where they integrate > fine...but...you knew there was a but... I see TCP session lockup up > problems across both ath9 & ath10k. > > LEDE recently went through some hell with wireless session lockups, > ably fixed by Felix - the apparent behaviour with your patches is > remarkably similar. > > How can I help? My guess is that my tree just needs a rebase on LEDE master to get those fixes. Did that now and updated my git repo :) -Toke