From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [IPv6:2001:470:dc45:1000::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D99713B29E for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 09:24:10 -0400 (EDT) From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1528896249; bh=/paEwFb6hPWGPhCFZw6Rjr7rDHIstUje4Hpt1tEQsRw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=pRMwSgms7c2NsUdKiNAX8+ErjNtoASAEQNSZP7/3X+b8HfH4YgPcPJEUp9deGw9U9 qYglJd662uS4wLDJMat5hS0oc0xM5ASDJ64/Kpn6wv2PPDPGlzsPFpEvoeBT5/XSFo QnD+qh99xY+kxFRhdJK5vNc5K+8AuVoLFgGS0PshLCpPMdLNKbaOt3RAzwzuLpS6bf 9rMEvp9iJuyzn2mLlIBcZCtaIyTCqlOE/1XOJjKaEJpsDmAOPrxZKmNai1evzrKc8Y 99irie+afWZcSY9BAnKIf2yohryW/MY/sSEfmjdnKQRNfq0WgFOLeJkgcg/dqWswde ku6+I3FxJmaNg== To: Pete Heist , bkil Cc: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net In-Reply-To: <9E7E043B-2373-46ED-B122-38A287422999@eventide.io> References: <9E7E043B-2373-46ED-B122-38A287422999@eventide.io> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 15:24:03 +0200 X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <87d0wu7rbg.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] mesh deployment with ath9k driver changes X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 13:24:11 -0000 Pete Heist writes: > Trying one thing at a time, as legacy_rates=3D=E2=80=981=E2=80=99 didn=E2= =80=99t do anything > noticeable, which is not surprising when we probably don=E2=80=99t have m= any > =E2=80=98b' devices connecting. We hit 4.9s ping times this morning, good > work. :) > > Even though isolation couldn=E2=80=99t be turned on in the admin interface > (because it says it can=E2=80=99t do it when bridging to a VLAN, for some > reason), I was able to enable isolation for both SSIDs and it still > seems to work, so that=E2=80=99s the change as of now: > > wireless.ap0_1.isolate=3D'1' > wireless.ap0_2.isolate=3D=E2=80=981=E2=80=99 > > Before I could ping between clients, and now I can=E2=80=99t, so apparent= ly > isolation is doing what it should. The next test will be tonight. > > I=E2=80=99m still waiting for the digging / cabling project to happen, wh= ich > is what I expect to bring the biggest benefit. Again, that will add a > new cabled AP which will serve as a gateway for cabin 12 and split > cabins 12 and 20. This should also improve the signal to 12 vastly, > which is one of the most loaded APs and currently only has RSSI -71 / > MCS 5 or 6 to its parent AP, now that the leaves are full on the > trees. How to improve WiFi? Run cables! :D -Toke