From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [52.28.52.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C54AA3B2A4 for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 21:34:02 -0500 (EST) From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1510281239; bh=QTtV12DIqUHDxWsYfa/Zkg337tMnaOBBzmskI9bE3Sw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=zL8JooMQIcqGTUY0bpqAByJuHS7tfegFMeyflAaPYhU5tmwGAX7fP3Ue6n59gfAHF EPsnlaoOafs9X78JlXGp/j1JVHzXmsnLmEc4hTk8sLwJWWd0qsVjMVkjJN4eIWITok WyKx+8sCuPIURYnpAVn3qPmJYrI9Pj51VR2276DDO5+4+J1Fg31Y1fKxi+YSyPGJRH 5UdyZRDiTubgtIIVZKjjsyiL20812/2s/oZw/eg9q6PPNdoSPgrSjSm2dkQkoxjS3i o+nh6KPJ5i76k67YEMBdijHGkHzkcMmwgmhAgQ+0ML21qMyLHo3TKZxhF56rekzMOk SAoRb74RbqQyA== To: Rajkumar Manoharan , Dave Taht , Kalle Valo Cc: "make-wifi-fast\@lists.bufferbloat.net" , "linux-wireless\@vger.kernel.org" , "ath10k\@lists.infradead.org" In-Reply-To: References: <20171109071945.11033-1-toke@toke.dk> <6112ae948ba2409da27709d01da567eb@NALASEXR01H.na.qualcomm.com> <87k1yzq9i8.fsf@toke.dk> Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 11:33:53 +0900 X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <87h8u2rhf2.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] [PATCH] ath10k: Re-enable TXQs for all devices X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 02:34:03 -0000 Rajkumar Manoharan writes: > Agree.. Even I am not fan of that patch in ath10k. IIRC Michal pushed > this change as temp one and planned to revert it once it is fixed in > stack or in driver. > > I thought Eric change in fq_codel is meant only for fatty udp flows. > Forgive my ignorance. It is, mostly. There's a separate possible issue with TCP performance that we're looking into, but that is unrelated to TXQs. -Toke