From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [77.235.48.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEE7B3B2AE for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 10:01:27 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail2.tohojo.dk DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 mail2.tohojo.dk 9DA1B41622 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=201310; t=1475244081; bh=yeEQBh4VZDeQv+pa4iG07irbjSDlxI9RtM9uNbWLQKs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=KVFIhuQhFBfdo/Wy32ZnT+u3amtPBcBwClDCX8zcREw4F21kfcIclE8QXHPr72cEN RJBsRe2EGircfaMGSfkRRVuOmgOX59zAqqocrb6UVbFWebOW4isnWzRwWfnLsLLJV5 Ogh7DhoA926qGFE3+T7oQFABrtrhoTLEemq12OYY= Received: by alrua-kau.kau.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 89BBEC4024B; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 16:01:20 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: Johannes Berg Cc: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org References: <20160922170420.5193-1-toke@toke.dk> <20160922170420.5193-3-toke@toke.dk> <1475239765.17481.61.camel@sipsolutions.net> Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 16:01:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1475239765.17481.61.camel@sipsolutions.net> (Johannes Berg's message of "Fri, 30 Sep 2016 14:49:25 +0200") X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <87lgy95vwv.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] [PATCH v9 2/2] mac80211: Move reorder-sensitive TX handlers to after TXQ dequeue X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 14:01:28 -0000 Johannes Berg writes: > Applied, with the nits fixed as discussed. Awesome, thanks! > Come to think of it, if somebody is bored ;-) perhaps a hwsim option > to use TXQs (should be optional I guess) would be nice so we can > exercise this code with the wpa_supplicant hwsim tests. That would > have caught the TKIP issues etc. pretty early on too, I think. Noted. I'll look into that the next time I'm bored ;) -Toke