From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: Aaron Wood <woody77@gmail.com>, make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] hacking on the candelatech and qca ath10k firmware
Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 23:30:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mvo49oqj.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw67M+iXZZ0zdJ7pMQMSh5k0ggAOo5G2BpyF6CcsG2aBRg@mail.gmail.com> (Dave Taht's message of "Thu, 5 May 2016 10:27:36 -0700")
Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Aaron Wood <woody77@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think you might be mis-reading the box-plots as error-bars (since their
>> quartile plots). I'll need to crunch the numbers, but I'm pretty sure that
>> the fq results are going to show a higher median throughput (and lower
>> median latency), with a fair bit of significance. I'll see if I can figure
>> out how to calculate the SD of the mean (and other quartiles) from the flent
>> output (I have scripts that can do this for iperf3's json output).
>
> Thanks in advance!!!
>
> I hate box plots honestly. They often lie. I'd rather look at a
> detailed time series first, and the box plot *only* after I verified
> that that was sane. And I'm not good at reading box plots right!
Also note that a box plot of a single test will show you "error bars"
which are really computed from the samples of the single flow; so they
are not independent samples, and so care should be taken when
interpreting them.
-Toke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-05 21:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-05 7:09 Dave Taht
2016-05-05 17:05 ` Aaron Wood
2016-05-05 17:27 ` Dave Taht
2016-05-05 21:30 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2016-05-05 21:45 ` Aaron Wood
2016-05-05 21:59 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2016-05-05 22:32 ` Dave Taht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/make-wifi-fast.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mvo49oqj.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@toke.dk \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=woody77@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox