From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [IPv6:2001:470:dc45:1000::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AC343B2A0 for ; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 06:55:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.toke.dk (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.toke.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F94A3185; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 12:55:20 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1479642920; bh=LDLWH8JCxGnp/vtU+pICLrV21S8Tsw98swgJ2y0PUWE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=lAk+4Kq74D4MuZD6YLX2hRIC2GyjlEVZu70PmHbgNO5wGKAcy6GF9TR9BgV3En1ZA eNLNEC7viOHBIMBGQfAxKaBe3XbQnqsFaGzUuuFml65Pqj17YDnyGiurgmxHQx0wZ4 6xgoLQiBRYhywtoHNgtoq24wQnVmtydSKKd4oI9w/FKsA3f3r9Kx7An6JSGSxJY2s6 FG5rx3iMvrwGiSF9PsWa/R3wZuD9Dg1/fOJhR8CK3yj0w75hJXQ7y9QkwRwMVnBtt0 yBUYiJmGtbSdo09GgdaOIFwsmbeusaAWQRPTPfBOVUhpj0TevnmPz2SLCAqDOmSLq5 o1xY799FROIrw== Received: by alrua-karlstad.karlstad.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 378E3955676; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 12:55:16 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: Dave Taht Cc: Sebastian Moeller , make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net References: <87vaviwgc4.fsf@toke.dk> Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 12:55:16 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Dave Taht's message of "Sun, 20 Nov 2016 03:39:15 -0800") X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <87r366wel7.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] flent adds more text output X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 11:55:21 -0000 Dave Taht writes: > I am not convinced the text output is actually correct - see attached graph. > > I am testing airtime fairness code on both an archer ap and ubuntu box > on the ath9k, and the udp flows show a peak of 80ms on the plot and a > median of 25ms on the ping, where... The summary output formatter doesn't discard null data points before computing the median. Guessing that's the reason for the discrepancy... -Toke