From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [77.235.48.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA9163B25E for ; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 13:35:04 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail2.tohojo.dk DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 mail2.tohojo.dk 7A3B540D5E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=201310; t=1474133702; bh=8buhrrjVDVQsFjlDuTfGJcbkvJFvdjQD4FJNg6Y+n/w=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=ZUfh87bpEDZ9opwITQvj1gOnZniLrRGJB4cEVchfnb2SrWlZhYZgYHpEBqanq++Ru uZVlHjg8vMgb2ZT/W57JRezL4FsakzjL1ZVJG/ZchFSnwXDLBInICU8dVBCde0Eg53 5K0tz+R5bPQjPgFa49CMJv8M2djRomoTPn8Vk4xo= Sender: toke@toke.dk Received: by alrua-karlstad.karlstad.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7E82384ED39; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 19:35:01 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: Loganaden Velvindron Cc: Dave Taht , make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net References: Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 19:35:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Loganaden Velvindron's message of "Sat, 17 Sep 2016 21:26:04 +0400") X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <87shsyjupm.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] crypto-fq bug postmortem is up X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 17:35:04 -0000 Loganaden Velvindron writes: > On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 9:12 PM, Loganaden Velvindron > wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 1:42 AM, Dave Taht wrote: >>> at: >>> >>> http://blog.cerowrt.org/post/crypto_fq_bug/ >>> >>> I am very interested to try to remember more of the suggestions, and >>> blind alleys, and why we thought they were possibilities... and draw >>> more conclusions as to what we did right, and wrong. >>> >>> Please comment, and send links. >>> >>> If I have more time, I'll make it shorter. Or funnier. And add more >>> pictures, captures, and links. Finding this bug *eventually* got to be >>> fun. >>> >> >> My home network: >> >> FTTH modem (bridge) --- tp-link archer c7 >> (pppoe+sqm+simple_pppoe(fq_codel)+ap) ---- (lan cable) --- tp-link >> archer c7 v2 with the experimental firmware(ap): >> Quick and dirty test: >> >> on non-patched openwrt wifi(wpa-psk): >> https://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/5028614 >> >> on tp-link archer c7 v2 with toke's firmware(wpa-psk): >> https://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/5028349 >> >> My brother said that "It feels like ethernet both in terms of >> throughput and latency". My brother is hammering the the tp-link >> archer c7 box with bittorrent, whatsapp, viber, and normal http. > > Testing on my android smartphone (android 6.0.1): > > Unpatched ap: > https://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/5028965 > > Patched ap: > https://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/5028940 > > On smartphones, it looks like you can get better throughput with > toke's firmware. Is this with other stations active? And how is the WiFi configured (HT20? HT40? 2.4Ghz or 5Ghz?). It's odd if the WiFi is the bottleneck at those speeds... -Toke