From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.taht.net (mail.taht.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:feae:7028]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7106C3B29E for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2019 22:24:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from dancer.taht.net (unknown [IPv6:2603:3024:1536:86f0:eea8:6bff:fefe:9a2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.taht.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7678C1F40B; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 03:24:25 +0000 (UTC) From: Dave Taht To: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= Cc: Johannes Berg , make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net, Rajkumar Manoharan , nbd@nbd.name References: <20190122142019.21417-1-toke@redhat.com> <20190122142019.21417-2-toke@redhat.com> <4f4eab34a995000d230c8b99cb6cff3f9dfd5c64.camel@sipsolutions.net> <87sgxgc199.fsf@toke.dk> Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2019 19:23:44 -0800 In-Reply-To: <87sgxgc199.fsf@toke.dk> ("Toke \=\?utf-8\?Q\?H\=C3\=B8iland-J\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?\=C3\=B8rgensen\=22's\?\= message of "Fri, 25 Jan 2019 14:31:14 +0100") Message-ID: <87tvhk6xtr.fsf_-_@taht.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: [Make-wifi-fast] State of the make-wifi-fast patchset? X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2019 03:24:27 -0000 Are we at the point yet where the whole is testable out of wireless-next? Are there "proper" devices readily available that can touch the controversy inducing ath10k stuff? I do have a lot of older ath10k gear... Has support for mt76 landed? Any prototype patches from intel? (this message partially triggered by the release of openwrt 18.06.2 and the pending 19.x branch, and being essentially asleep since christmas)